...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >MECHANICAL AERATION AND LIQUID DAIRY MANURE APPLICATION IMPACTS ON GRASSLAND RUNOFF WATER QUALITY AND YIELD
【24h】

MECHANICAL AERATION AND LIQUID DAIRY MANURE APPLICATION IMPACTS ON GRASSLAND RUNOFF WATER QUALITY AND YIELD

机译:机械曝气和液体乳制品施用对草原径流水质和产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The runoff water quality and agronomic impacts of mechanical aeration and liquid dairy manure (LDM) application to grassland (orchard grass with 10% to 20% alfalfa) were evaluated in two blocks. Simulated rainfall-generated runoff was collected six times from block A, and natural runoff was collected from block B once. Runoff samples were analyzed for nitrate-nitrogen (NO{sub}3-N), ammoniacal-N, total Kjeldahl N (TKN), dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total P, and total suspended solids (TSS). The four treatments applied to the plots were control (CTL, no aeration and no LDM), aeration (AER), LDM application but no aeration (MAN), and aeration plus LDM application (AER+MAN). The plots were harvested three times, and crop yields and crop nutrient (N-P-K) contents were determined. Aeration impact on soil impedance was evaluated with a penetrometer. In one simulated event, AER+MAN significantly reduced runoff, while the other treatments were comparable. Nutrient concentrations in simulated runoff increased with LDM application but were unaffected by aeration. Aeration reduced nutrient loadings of three or more species (not TKN) from manured plots in two of six simulated runoff events but not from non-manured plots. Aeration of manured plots was more effective in reducing DRP losses than other nutrient species. Mean total loadings of all nutrient species in simulated runoff were reduced ≥26% by AER+MAN vs. MAN. While aeration significantly increased TSS concentrations in simulated runoff, LDM application did not. In one of six simulated events, AER had the highest TSS loadings, while AER+MAN had the lowest, with the two other treatments in between. No treatment effects were observed with natural runoff for any constituent. The MAN treatment significantly increased forage yield in two harvests vs. CTL and AER and in one harvest vs. AER+MAN. Compared with MAN, total forage yields with CTL, AER, and AER+MAN were 78%, 67%, and 81%, respectively. Aeration reduced soil impedance and could improve root penetration in compacted soils.
机译:在两个区块中评估了径流水质以及机械通气和液态乳牛粪(LDM)应用于草地(果园草含10%至20%苜蓿)的径流水质和农艺影响。从A区收集了6次模拟降雨产生的径流,从B区收​​集了1次自然径流。分析了径流样品中的硝酸盐氮(NO {sub} 3-N),氨氮,总凯氏氮(TKN),溶解性活性磷(DRP),总磷和总悬浮固体(TSS)。应用于地块的四种处理方法是对照(CTL,无曝气且无LDM),曝气(AER),LDM应用但无曝气(MAN)和曝气加LDM应用(AER + MAN)。将该地块收获3次,并测定作物产量和作物养分(N-P-K)含量。用针入度计评估通气对土壤阻抗的影响。在一个模拟事件中,AER + MAN显着减少了径流,而其他方法却相当。施用LDM可使模拟径流中的养分浓度增加,但不受通气影响。曝气减少了六个模拟径流事件中的两个中来自施肥地的三个或更多物种(非TKN)的养分含量,但未来自非施肥地。与其他养分种类相比,对粪肥地进行曝气在减少DRP损失方面更为有效。 AER + MAN与MAN相比,模拟径流中所有营养物质的平均总负荷降低了≥26%。虽然通气显着增加了模拟径流中的TSS浓度,但LDM应用却没有。在六个模拟事件之一中,AER的TSS负荷最高,而AER + MAN的负荷最低,介于两者之间。天然径流对任何成分均未观察到处理效果。与CTL和AER相比,在两次收获中,MAN处理显着提高了饲料产量;而与AER + MAN相比,在一次收获中,MAN处理显着提高了草料产量。与MAN相比,CTL,AER和AER + MAN的总草料产量分别为78%,67%和81%。曝气可降低土壤阻抗,并可以提高压实土壤的根系渗透性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号