首页> 外文期刊>Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie >COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO GENTRIFICATION: A RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
【24h】

COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO GENTRIFICATION: A RESEARCH FRAMEWORK

机译:族群比较方法:研究框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Comparative research on gentrification is on the rise, especially since gentrification is no longer confined to historical, central neighbourhoods in First World countries, but also appeared in rural, new-built areas and Second World countries. In this paper we present our comparative approach to investigate gentrification processes in four European cities (Arnhem, Istanbul, Vienna, Zurich), which differs from previous studies in its use of assemblage theory as research framework. The multi-layered framework discerns three levels: 'metrics', 'interpretations', and 'practices'. We argue that many comparative studies mainly focus on metrics, while researching interpretations and practices instead - and how these three levels influence each other through processes of actualisation and counteractualisation - would enhance our knowledge on gentrification. In doing so, we aim to provide a precise account of the nested relations of different layers of empirical reality and thus respond to various calls in the debate to intensively examine 'geographies of gentrification'.
机译:关于高档化的比较研究正在增加,特别是因为高档化不再局限于第一世界国家的历史中心地区,而是出现在农村,新建地区和第二世界国家。在本文中,我们介绍了比较方法来研究四个欧洲城市(阿纳姆,伊斯坦布尔,维也纳,苏黎世)的绅士化过程,这与以前的研究不同,其使用组合理论作为研究框架。多层框架可识别三个级别:“度量”,“解释”和“实践”。我们认为,许多比较研究主要关注度量标准,而相反,研究解释和实践以及这三个层次如何通过实现和反事实化过程相互影响,将会增强我们对高级化的认识。通过这样做,我们的目的是提供对经验现实的不同层面的嵌套关系的精确解释,从而响应辩论中的各种呼吁,以深入研究“中产阶级化的地理位置”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号