...
首页> 外文期刊>Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association >The effectiveness of radioactive iodine for treatment of low-risk thyroid cancer: a systematic analysis of the peer-reviewed literature from 1966 to April 2008.
【24h】

The effectiveness of radioactive iodine for treatment of low-risk thyroid cancer: a systematic analysis of the peer-reviewed literature from 1966 to April 2008.

机译:放射性碘治疗低危甲状腺癌的有效性:1966年至2008年4月经过同行评审的文献的系统分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation has been used to eliminate normal thyroid tissue and may also facilitate monitoring for persistent or recurrent thyroid carcinoma. The use of RAI for low-risk patients who we define as those under age 45 with stage I disease or over age 45 with stage I or II disease based on American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 6th edition, or low risk under the metastases, age, completeness of resection, invasion, size (MACIS) staging system (value <6) is controversial. In this extensive literature review, we sought to analyze the evidence for use of RAI treatment to improve mortality and survival and to reduce recurrence in patients of various stages and disease risk, particularly for those patients who are at low risk for recurrence and death from thyroid cancer. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted for studies published between January 1966 and April 2008 that compared the effectiveness of administering versus not administering RAI for treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Studies were grouped A through D based on their methodological rigor (best to worst). An analysis, focused on group A studies, was performed to determine whether treatment with RAI for DTC results in decreased recurrences and improved survival rates. RESULTS: The majority of studies did not find a statistically significant improvement in mortality or disease-specific survival in those low-risk patients treated with RAI, whereas improved survival was confirmed for high-risk (AJCC stages III and IV) patients. Evidence for RAI decreasing recurrence was mixed with half of the studies showing a significant relationship and half showing no relationship. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a management guideline based on a patient's risk-very low, low, moderate, and high-for clinicians to use when delineating those patients who should undergo RAI treatment for initial postoperative management of DTC. A majority of very low-risk and low-risk patients, as well as select cases of patients with moderate risk do not demonstrate survival or disease-free survival benefit from postoperative RAI treatment, and therefore we recommend against postoperative RAI in these cases.
机译:背景:放射性碘(RAI)残留消融已被用于消除正常的甲状腺组织,也可能有助于监测持续性或复发性甲状腺癌。根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第6版,我们将RAI用于低风险患者,我们将其定义为I期疾病的45岁以下患者或I或II期疾病的45岁以上患者,或转移下的低风险患者,年龄,切除的完整性,侵袭性,大小(MACIS)分期系统(值<6)存在争议。在本篇广泛的文献综述中,我们试图分析使用RAI治疗以提高死亡率和生存率并减少各种阶段和疾病风险的患者(尤其是那些甲状腺疾病的复发和死亡风险较低的患者)的证据。癌症。方法:对1966年1月至2008年4月之间发表的研究进行了MEDLINE搜索,该研究比较了使用RAI和不使用RAI治疗分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)的有效性。根据研究方法的严格程度(从最好到最差)将研究分为A到D。进行了针对A组研究的分析,以确定DAI的RAI治疗是否会导致复发率降低和生存率提高。结果:大多数研究未发现那些接受RAI治疗的低危患者的死亡率或疾病特异性生存率有统计学意义的改善,而高危患者(AJCC III和IV期)的生存率得到了改善。 RAI减少复发的证据与一半的研究显示出显着的相关性,一半的研究表明没有相关性。结论:我们提出了一个基于患者风险的管理指南-低,低,中,高风险,供临床医生在确定应接受RAI治疗以进行DTC的初始术后管理的患者时使用。大多数极低风险和低风险患者以及部分中度风险患者并未表现出术后RAI治疗可生存或无病生存,因此建议在这些情况下反对术后RAI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号