首页> 外文期刊>Tierarztliche Praxis, Ausgabe G. GroBtiere >Automatic feeding systems for horses in group housing systems with regard to animal welfare. Part 1: Feeding stalls versus automatic feeding systems. [German]Original Title Tiergerechtheit von Futterabrufstationen in der Gruppenhaltung von Pferden.
【24h】

Automatic feeding systems for horses in group housing systems with regard to animal welfare. Part 1: Feeding stalls versus automatic feeding systems. [German]Original Title Tiergerechtheit von Futterabrufstationen in der Gruppenhaltung von Pferden.

机译:有关动物福利的团体住房系统中的马匹自动饲喂系统。第1部分:与自动喂料系统相比的喂料摊位。 [德语]原标题:马群饲养中的饲料回收站的动物福利。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: A comparison with regard to animal welfare of feeding stalls and automatic feeding systems for hay and concentrates in group housing systems for horses using parameters of ethology and physiology. Material and method: The observations of animal behaviour took place in 10 stables with feeding stalls and in 11 stables with automatic feeding systems. The field around the feeding systems was divided into three areas with comparable dimensions (waiting area, exit area and inside of the feeding system). 270 horses were individually observed. Parameters of research comprised: threatening behaviour with and without risk of injury, avoiding behaviour, "chasing away from the feeding place", as well as heart rate and injuries of the integument. Every group of horses was continuously observed for 24 hours. This observation took place on four different days and comprised six sessions, each of 4 hours. Results: In the waiting area of the automatic systems there were significantly more threatening gestures with and without risk of injuries for each horse and day (8.6 and 3.0, respectively) than in the waiting area of the feeding stalls. In contrast, the horses could eat more relaxed in the automatic systems (1.4 threatening gestures for each horse and day) than in the feeding stalls (3.2 threatening gestures for each horse and day). All together the number of negative interactions in the feeding area of both feeding systems was relatively low. The heart rate was within the physiological range (44,59+or-11,73 beats/min) in the waiting area. There were no injuries of the integument in correlation with the feeding systems. The most important factor of the observation criteria was the individual group housing system with its different dimension, conception and management. Conclusion: Under the aspect of animal welfare both feeding systems are suitable for horses with respect to the risk of stress and injuries by social interactions and under the condition of proper group housing with professional management.
机译:目的:使用人类学和生理学参数,比较马场和干草集中饲喂场和自动饲喂系统的动物福利。材料和方法:动物行为的观察是在10个带有饲养棚的马s和11个带有自动饲养系统的马s中进行的。进料系统周围的区域被划分为三个具有相似尺寸的区域(等待区,出口区和进料系统内部)。单独观察到270匹马。研究的参数包括:在有或没有受伤危险的情况下威胁行为,避免行为,“远离喂养场所”以及心率和被膜的伤害。每组马连续观察24小时。该观察发生在四个不同的日期,包括六个时段,每个时段为4个小时。结果:在自动系统的等候区中,每头马和一天的威胁手势(有和没有受伤的危险)明显多于饲喂摊位的等候区(分别为8.6和3.0)。相比之下,在自动系统中,马匹的进食(每只马每天1.4个威胁手势)比在饲喂摊位(每只马每天3.2个威胁手势)吃得更轻松。在两个进料系统的进料区域中,负相互作用的总数相对较低。在等候区,心率在生理范围内(44,59+或-11.73次/分钟)。没有与进食系统相关的皮被受伤。观察标准中最重要的因素是具有不同维度,构想和管理方式的个人集体住房系统。结论:在动物福利方面,两种喂养系统都适合于马,因为它们在社会交往中承受压力和受伤的风险,并且在适当的团体住房和专业管理的条件下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号