...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >Reversal of new, factor-specific oral anticoagulants by rFVIIa, prothrombin complex concentrate and activated prothrombin complex concentrate: A review of animal and human studies
【24h】

Reversal of new, factor-specific oral anticoagulants by rFVIIa, prothrombin complex concentrate and activated prothrombin complex concentrate: A review of animal and human studies

机译:rFVIIa,凝血酶原复合物浓缩物和活化凝血酶原复合物浓缩物逆转新的因子特异性口服抗凝剂:动物和人体研究综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and activated PCC (aPCC) are three non-specific haemostatic agents sometimes employed to reverse new, factor-specific oral anticoagulants. Methods We conducted a review in the literature to compare the abilities of rFVIIa, PCC and aPCC to reverse factor-specific anticoagulants. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched up to Oct 2013. Results Eleven animal studies and two human trials met predefined inclusion criteria. To account for dosing variations of anticoagulants among studies, data were interpreted based on standards referenced from human trials at therapeutic doses. In animal studies, inconsistencies in the reversal abilities of rFVIIa, PCC and aPCC can be partly attributed to inter-species differences in the affinity among various clotting factors and tissue factors. Moreover, the differences in the affinity between species-specific clotting factors and anticoagulants that were initially designed to inhibit human factor may impose additional obstacles when comparing single factor rFVIIa with agents that contained multiple clotting factors. In the absence of a common clinical indication for the utilization of rFVIIa, PCC and aPCC, it is difficult, if not impossible, to establish an equivalent dose among these haemostatic agents when comparing their effectiveness in reversing factor-specific oral anticoagulants. Human trials were too few and sub-optimally designed to draw definite conclusions. Conclusion While preclinical studies may hint at a role for these haemostatic agents in reversing the anticoagulant effects of oral, factor-specific anticoagulants, existing trials offer inconclusive evidence to guide a clinical decision among individual agents with respect to potency and thrombosis risk. The mechanistic differences of these hemostatic agents in terms of their interactions with other coagulation factors impose major obstacles for the scientists using animal models to compare the efficacy of these reversal agents.
机译:引言重组活化因子VII(rFVIIa),凝血酶原复合浓缩物(PCC)和活化PCC(aPCC)是三种非特异性止血剂,有时可用来逆转新的因子特异性口服抗凝剂。方法我们在文献中进行了综述,以比较rFVIIa,PCC和aPCC逆转因子特异性抗凝剂的能力。截至2013年10月,已搜索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库。结果十一项动物研究和两项人类试验符合预定的纳入标准。为了说明研究中抗凝剂的剂量差异,根据人类试验中治疗剂量引用的标准解释了数据。在动物研究中,rFVIIa,PCC和aPCC的逆转能力不一致可能部分归因于各种凝血因子和组织因子之间亲和力的种间差异。此外,当将单因子rFVIIa与包含多种凝血因子的药物进行比较时,最初设计为抑制人因子的物种特异性凝血因子与抗凝剂之间亲和力之间的差异可能会带来其他障碍。在缺乏使用rFVIIa,PCC和aPCC的常见临床指征的情况下,比较这些药物在逆转因子特异性口服抗凝药中的有效性时,即使不是不可能,也很难确定等效剂量。人体试验太少了,设计欠佳,无法得出明确的结论。结论虽然临床前研究可能暗示了这些止血剂在逆转口服抗凝血因子的抗凝作用中的作用,但现有的试验提供了不确定的证据来指导个体之间就效力和血栓风险进行临床决策。这些止血剂在与其他凝血因子相互作用方面的机理差异为使用动物模型比较这些逆转剂疗效的科学家带来了主要障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号