首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >Prophylaxis of upper limb deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients with central vein catheter.
【24h】

Prophylaxis of upper limb deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients with central vein catheter.

机译:中心静脉导管预防癌症患者的上肢深静脉血栓形成。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis for central vein catheter (CVC)-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in cancer patients has never been clearly defined (1-6). Based on published studies, current guidelines do not recommend routine prophylaxis to prevent CVC-related DVT in cancer patients (7).We found of interest the meta-analysis on thromboprophylaxisfor CVC-related DVT in cancer patients recently published in this journal by Chaukiyal et al. (8). This meta-analysis failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin (composite relative risk [RR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-1.20, p= 0.06). Of interest, no statistically significant differences were shown in the risk of thrombocytopenia (RR 0.85 95%CI 0.49-1.46, p= 0.55) and bleeding (RR 1.24 95%CI 0.84-1.82, p= 0.28) between patients receiving or not thromboprophylaxis.
机译:癌症患者抗中央静脉导管(CVC)相关的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的抗血栓预防的临床益处尚未明确定义(1-6)。根据已发表的研究,当前指南不建议常规预防以预防癌症患者CVC相关DVT(7)。我们感兴趣的是Chaukiyal等人最近在该杂志上发表的针对癌症患者CVC相关DVT的血栓预防性荟萃分析。等(8)。该荟萃分析未能证明普通肝素或低分子量肝素或华法林的有益作用(复合相对危险度[RR] 0.46,95%置信区间[CI] 0.18-1.20,p = 0.06)。有趣的是,接受或未接受血栓预防的患者之间的血小板减少症风险(RR 0.85 95%CI 0.49-1.46,p = 0.55)和出血(RR 1.24 95%CI 0.84-1.82,p = 0.28)之间均无统计学差异。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号