...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration.
【24h】

The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration.

机译:在使用普拉格雷和氯吡格雷后,使用VerifyNow P2Y12即时医疗设备监测一系列P2Y12抑制水平的血小板功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Variability in response to antiplatelet agents has prompted the development of point-of-care (POC) technology. In this study, we compared the VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) POC device with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in subjects switched directly from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Healthy subjects on aspirin were administered a clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by a 75 mg/d maintenance dose (MD) for 10 days. Subjects were then switched to a prasugrel 60 mg LD and then 10 mg/d MD for 10 days (n = 16), or to a prasugrel 10 mg/d MD for 11 days (n = 19). Platelet function was measured by LTA and VN-P2Y12 at baseline and after dosing. Clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD treatment led to a reduction in P2Y(12) reaction units (PRU) from baseline. A switch from clopidogrel MD to prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg MD produced an immediate decrease in PRU, while a switch to prasugrel 10 mg MD resulted in a more gradual decline. Consistent with the reduction in PRU, device-reported percent inhibition increased during both clopidogrel and prasugrel regimens. Inhibition of platelet aggregation as measured by LTA showed a very similar pattern to that found with VN-P2Y12 measurement, irrespective of treatment regimens. The dynamic range of VN-P2Y12 appeared to be narrower than that of LTA. With two different thienopyridines, the VN-P2Y12 device, within a somewhat more limited range, reflected the overall magnitude of change in aggregation response determined by LTA. The determination of the clinical utility of such POC devices will require their use in clinical outcome studies.
机译:对抗血小板药的反应变异性促使了即时护理(POC)技术的发展。在这项研究中,我们比较了从氯吡格雷直接转换为普拉格雷的受试者中,VerifyNow P2Y12(VN-P2Y12)POC设备与光透射聚集法(LTA)的比较。服用阿司匹林的健康受试者接受了600 mg氯吡格雷负荷剂量(LD),然后是75 mg / d维持剂量(MD),持续10天。然后将受试者切换至普拉格雷60 mg LD,然后切换至10 mg / d MD持续10天(n = 16),或切换至普拉格雷10 mg / d MD持续11天(n = 19)。在基线时和给药后,通过LTA和VN-P2Y12测量血小板功能。氯吡格雷600 mg LD / 75 mg MD治疗导致P2Y(12)反应单位(PRU)与基线相比降低。从氯吡格雷MD改为普拉格雷60 mg LD / 10 mg MD可使PRU立即下降,而切换至普拉格雷10 mg MD则导致逐渐降低。与PRU的降低一致,氯吡格雷和普拉格雷治疗期间设备报告的抑制百分比均增加。通过LTA测得的血小板聚集抑制作用与VN-P2Y12测得的抑制作用非常相似,而与治疗方案无关。 VN-P2Y12的动态范围似乎比LTA的​​窄。使用两种不同的噻吩并吡啶,VN-P2Y12装置在稍微更有限的范围内,反映了LTA确定的聚集反应变化的总体幅度。确定此类POC设备的临床效用将需要在临床结果研究中使用它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号