...
首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >Christopher J. Coyne and Peter T. Leeson, Media, Development, and Institutional Change Cheltenham., UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2009
【24h】

Christopher J. Coyne and Peter T. Leeson, Media, Development, and Institutional Change Cheltenham., UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2009

机译:Christopher J. Coyne和Peter T. Leeson,媒体,发展和机构变革,英国切尔滕纳姆和马萨诸塞州北安普敦:爱德华·埃尔加,2009年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Television viewers in Venezuela are accustomed to having their programming interrupted by Hugo Chavez, who regularly broadcasts whatever he feels like on every channel in the nation.1 To the American visitor, this seems like just one of the many disadvantageous consequences of living under a dictatorship. Conversely, the idea that media propaganda propagates dictatorial regimes has been cemented in the popular mind ever since the publication of George Orwell's 1984. Whichever way one looks at it, media and dictatorship are clearly linked. But is an unfree media a cause of unfree political institutions, or is it a consequence? In the latest entry in the New Thinking in Political Economy book series published by Edward Elgar Press, Christopher J. Coyne and Peter T. Leeson argue convincingly that the arrow of causation in fact runs both ways.
机译:委内瑞拉的电视观众习惯于将雨果·查韦斯(Hugo Chavez)的节目打断,后者定期在美国的每个频道播放他的感觉。1对于美国游客来说,这似乎只是独裁统治下许多不利后果之一。 。相反,自从乔治·奥威尔(George Orwell)1984年发表以来,媒体宣传传播专制政权的思想就已经深深地印在了大众的心中。无论从哪一种角度看,媒体和专政都是有明显联系的。但是,不自由的媒体是不自由的政治制度的原因,还是后果?在由爱德华·埃尔加出版社(Edward Elgar Press)出版的《政治经济学的新思维》丛书的最新条目中,克里斯托弗·科恩(Christopher J. Coyne)和彼得·T·利森(Peter T. Leeson)令人信服地指出,因果关系实际上是双向的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号