...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management >Assessment of Antishivering Medication Requirements During Therapeutic Normothermia: Effect of Cooling Methods
【24h】

Assessment of Antishivering Medication Requirements During Therapeutic Normothermia: Effect of Cooling Methods

机译:正常体温治疗过程中抗颤抖药物需求的评估:冷却方法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shivering during targeted temperature management (TTM) should be minimized because it can cause cerebral and metabolic stress. It has been proposed that surface cooling (SC) may result in more shivering than endovascular cooling (EC) methods. The purpose of this study was to compare antishivering medication requirements and degree of shivering in these groups during TTM to Normothermia (NT). This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients treated with protocolized TTM through SC and EC methods to achieve NT (37.0-37.5 degrees C). The number of interventions and daily dose of antishivering medications, per institutional protocol, were compared between the two groups. The intensity of shivering was assessed with the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale. Patients in the EC group (n=23) had more antishivering interventions per patient day than those in the SC group (n=43) (3.28 vs. 2.67, p=0.002). Acetaminophen (81% vs. 59%, p<0.001), buspirone (75% vs. 53%, p<0.001), and magnesium infusions (52% vs. 36%, p=0.012) were used on more patient days in the EC group. Patients treated with SC required more patient days of propofol (35% vs. 19%, p=0.006) and higher average dexmedetomidine dosing per patient-day (0.70 vs. 0.56g/[kg.h], p=0.03). Dosing of other medications was similar. There were no observed differences in degree or intensity of shivering. In our cohort, patients in EC group required more antishivering interventions, but less sedation, during TTM than patients in SC group. Optimizing nonsedating medications, such as acetaminophen, buspirone, and magnesium infusions, may decrease the requirement for sedatives to control shivering in both SC and EC.
机译:应将目标温度管理(TTM)期间的颤抖降至最低,因为这会引起大脑和代谢压力。已经提出,与血管内冷却(EC)方法相比,表面冷却(SC)可导致更多的发抖。这项研究的目的是比较在正常治疗(TM)和正常体温(NT)期间这些组的抗颤抖药物需求和发抖程度。这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究对象是通过SC和EC方法接受规约化TTM治疗的患者达到NT(37.0-37.5摄氏度)。在两组之间比较了每种机构规程的干预次数和抗颤抖药物的日剂量。用床边发抖评估量表评估发抖的强度。 EC组(n = 23)的患者每天比SC组(n = 43)的患者具有更多的抗颤抖干预措施(3.28 vs. 2.67,p = 0.002)。对乙酰氨基酚(81%vs. 59%,p <0.001),丁螺环酮(75%vs.53%,p <0.001)和镁输注(52%vs. 36%,p = 0.012)用于更多的患者日EC组。接受SC治疗的患者需要更多的丙泊酚患者天数(35%比19%,p = 0.006)和每位患者每天更高的右美托咪定剂量(0.70 vs. 0.56g / [kg.h],p = 0.03)。其他药物的剂量相似。没有观察到发抖程度或强度的差异。在我们的队列中,EC组的患者在TTM期间比SC组的患者需要更多的抗颤抖干预措施,但镇静作用更少。优化非镇静药物,例如对乙酰氨基酚,丁螺环酮和镁的输注,可能会减少镇静剂对控制SC和EC颤抖的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号