首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >The use of TDM data to assess the validity of defined daily doses of antiepileptics: a comparison between a Czech and Swedish University Hospital.
【24h】

The use of TDM data to assess the validity of defined daily doses of antiepileptics: a comparison between a Czech and Swedish University Hospital.

机译:使用TDM数据评估抗癫痫药每日确定剂量的有效性:捷克大学和瑞典大学医院之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prescribed daily doses (PDDs) of antiepileptic drugs (AED) (N03A ATC group) were recorded for drugs used in monotherapy or in combination therapy in the University Hospitals in Ostrava, Czech Republic and Huddinge, Sweden. Plasma concentrations were used as an indicator of the quality of treatment. PDDs were compared with the defined daily doses (DDDs) suggested by WHO in the ATC/DDD index 2005. Request and reply forms for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were used as a source of mean PDDs. The study included 2,824 adult out- and in-patients in Huddinge treated from 1995 to 1999 and 1,268 out-patients treated in Ostrava from 1993 to 2004. The differences in PDD were tested by Student's t-test. Mean values of PDD were used when patients were examined more than once. Doses given in mono- and polytherapy were compared. Mean PDDs (in mg) in mono-/polytherapy in Huddinge and Ostrava were as follows (DDDs in parenthesis): carbamazepine 588/842 and 618/770 (1,000), clonazepam 3.0/2.5 and 3.4/2.4 (8), phenytoin 278/314 and 291/288 (300), gabapentin -/1,533 and -/921 (1,800), lamotrigine 228/228 and 216/195 (300), phenobarbital 90/75 and 183/117 (100), vigabatrin -/1,794 and -/1,259 (2,000), valproic acid 1,139/1,476 and 814/950 (1,500). The PDDs of most of the AEDs were lower than the DDDs with the exceptions for valproic acid (Huddinge, in polytherapy only), phenytoin, for which PDDs and DDDs were very close, and phenobarbital for which they were similar in Huddinge but higher in Ostrava. PDDs in monotherapy were only slightly lower than in combination therapy. Patients with plasma concentrations within the therapeutic range were usually treated with slightly higher doses than the remainder. In general, plasma concentrations tended to be in the low therapeutic range. The differences in PDDs between hospitals were significant in the case of valproic acid (P < 0.001), phenobarbital (except monotherapy within), vigabatrin, and gabapentin (P < 0.01), and carbamazepine (in monotherapy P < 0.05, polytherapy P <0.01). Our data suggest that the DDDs of AEDs should be reconsidered as, in the majority of cases, they appear to be too high.
机译:在捷克共和国的俄斯特拉发和瑞典的胡丁德的大学医院中,记录了用于单一疗法或联合疗法的药物的抗癫痫药(AED)的每日规定剂量(PDD)。血浆浓度用作治疗质量的指标。将PDD与世界卫生组织在ATC / DDD指数2005中建议的确定的日剂量(DDD)进行比较。用于治疗药物监测(TDM)的请求和答复表格被用作平均PDD的来源。该研究包括1995年至1999年在Huddinge接受治疗的2,824名成人门诊和住院病人,以及1993年至2004年在俄斯特拉发接受治疗的1,268名门诊病人。当检查患者不止一次时,使用PDD平均值。比较了单药治疗和多药治疗的剂量。 Huddinge和Ostrava单药/多药治疗的平均PDDs(mg)如下(括号中为DDDs):卡马西平588/842和618/770(1,000),氯硝西am 3.0 / 2.5和3.4 / 2.4(8),苯妥英278 / 314和291/288(300),加巴喷丁-/ 1,533和-/ 921(1,800),拉莫三嗪228/228和216/195(300),苯巴比妥90/75和183/117(100),维加巴汀-/ 1,794 --1,259(2,000),丙戊酸1,139 / 1,476和814/950(1,500)。除丙戊酸(Huddinge,仅在多药治疗中),苯妥英钠(其PDD和DDD非常接近)和苯巴比妥(在Huddinge中相似但在俄斯特拉发中较高)之外,大多数AED的PDD均低于DDD。 。单一疗法的PDD仅略低于联合疗法。血浆浓度在治疗范围内的患者通常接受的剂量要比其余患者略高。通常,血浆浓度倾向于在低治疗范围内。丙戊酸(P <0.001),苯巴比妥(单药治疗除外),维加巴汀和加巴喷丁(P <0.01)和卡马西平(单药治疗P <0.05,多药治疗P <0.01 )。我们的数据表明,应重新考虑AED的DDD,因为在大多数情况下,它们似乎过高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号