...
首页> 外文期刊>Thorax: The Journal of the British Thoracic Society >Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation in copd patients with prolonged hypercapnia after ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure: A randomised, controlled, parallel-group study
【24h】

Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation in copd patients with prolonged hypercapnia after ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure: A randomised, controlled, parallel-group study

机译:急性呼吸衰竭通气支持后长期高碳酸血症患者的夜间无创通气:一项随机,对照,平行分组研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction The effectiveness of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) in COPD patients with prolonged hypercapnia after ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains unclear. We investigated if nocturnal NIV in these patients prolongs the time to readmission for respiratory causes or death ( primary endpoint) in the following 12 months. Methods 201 COPD patients admitted to hospital with ARF and prolonged hypercapnia >48 h after termination of ventilatory support were randomised to NIV or standard treatment. Secondary outcomes were daytime arterial blood gasses, transcutaneous PCO2 during the night, lung function, health-related quality-of-life (HRQL), mood state, daily activities and dyspnoea. Results 1 year after discharge, 65% versus 64% of patients (NIV vs standard treatment) were readmitted to hospital for respiratory causes or had died; time to event was not different ( p=0.85). Daytime PaCO2 was significantly improved in NIV versus standard treatment (PaCO2 0.5 kPa (95% CI 0.04 to 0.90, p=0.03)) as was transcutaneous PCO2 during the night. HRQL showed a trend (p=0.054, Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire) in favour of NIV. Number of exacerbations, lung function, mood state, daily activity levels or dyspnoea was not significantly different. Discussions We could not demonstrate an improvement in time to readmission or death by adding NIV for 1 year in patients with prolonged hypercapnia after an episode of NIV for ARF. There is no reason to believe the NIV was not effective since daytime PaCO2 and night-time PCO2 improved. The trend for improvement in HRQL favouring NIV we believe nevertheless should be explored further.
机译:简介对于急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)的通气支持后,COPD合并高碳酸血症的患者,无创正压通气(NIV)的疗效尚不清楚。我们调查了这些患者的夜间NIV是否在接下来的12个月中延长了呼吸原因或死亡的再入院时间(主要终点)。方法将201例COPD患者入院并接受ARF治疗,并在终止通气支持后48h内出现高碳酸血症,随机分为NIV或标准治疗组。次要结果是白天动脉血气,夜间经皮PCO2,肺功能,健康相关的生活质量(HRQL),情绪状态,日常活动和呼吸困难。结果出院1年后,有65%的患者(64%)(相对于标准治疗)与64%的患者因呼吸系统原因或死亡而再次住院。到达事件的时间没有不同(p = 0.85)。相对于标准治疗(PaCO2 0.5 kPa(95%CI 0.04至0.90,p = 0.03)),白天的NIV白天PaCO2显着改善,与夜间经皮PCO2一样。 HRQL表现出倾向于NIV的趋势(p = 0.054,严重呼吸功能不全问卷)。加重次数,肺功能,情绪状态,日常活动水平或呼吸困难无明显差异。讨论对于NRF发作后持续时间过长的高碳酸血症患者,在一年中加用NIV不能证明再入院或死亡时间有所改善。没有理由相信自白天PaCO2和夜间PCO2改善以来NIV无效。我们认为,HRQL的改善趋势将有利于NIV,但我们仍应进一步探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号