...
首页> 外文期刊>Thorax: The Journal of the British Thoracic Society >Dyspnoea severity and pneumonia as predictors of in-hospital mortality and early readmission in acute exacerbations of COPD
【24h】

Dyspnoea severity and pneumonia as predictors of in-hospital mortality and early readmission in acute exacerbations of COPD

机译:呼吸困难严重程度和肺炎是COPD急性加重期间医院内死亡率和早期再入院的预测指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Rates of mortality and readmission are high in patients hospitalised with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). In this population, the prognostic value of the Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MRCD) is uncertain, and an extended MRCD (eMRCD) scale has been proposed to improve its utility. Coexistent pneumonia is common and, although the CURB-65 prediction tool is used, its discriminatory value has not been reported. Methods: Clinical and demographic data were collected on consecutive patients hospitalised with AECOPD. The relationship of stable-state dyspnoea severity to inhospital mortality and 28-day readmission was assessed. The discriminatory value of CURB-65, MRCD and eMRCD, in the prediction of in-hospital mortality, was assessed and compared. Results: 920 patients were recruited. 10.4% died inhospital and 19.1% of the 824 survivors were readmitted within 28 days of discharge. During their stable state prior to admission, 34.2% of patients were too breathless to leave the house. Mortality was significantly higher in pneumonic than in non-pneumonic exacerbations (20.1% vs 5.8%, p<0.001). eMRCD was a significantly better discriminator than either CURB-65 or the traditional MRCD scale for predicting in-hospital mortality, and was a stronger prognostic tool than CURB- 65 in the subgroup of patients with pneumonic AECOPD. Conclusions: The severity of dyspnoea in the stable state predicts important clinical outcomes in patients hospitalised with AECOPD. The eMRCD scale identifies a subgroup of patients at a particularly high risk of in-hospital mortality and is a better predictor of mortality risk than CURB-65 in exacerbations complicated by pneumonia.
机译:背景:住院治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重患者的死亡率和再入院率很高。在该人群中,医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(MRCD)的预后价值尚不确定,并且已提出扩展MRCD(eMRCD)量表以提高其实用性。共存性肺炎很常见,尽管使用了CURB-65预测工具,但尚未报告其鉴别价值。方法:收集连续住院的AECOPD患者的临床和人口统计学数据。评估了稳态呼吸困难严重程度与院内死亡率和28天再入院的关系。评估并比较了CURB-65,MRCD和eMRCD在预测院内死亡率方面的区别价值。结果:招募了920例患者。出院后28天内重新入院的10.4%死于住院患者,而824名幸存者中有19.1%被重新接纳。入院前处于稳定状态的患者中,有34.2%的患者呼吸困难,无法离开家。肺炎患者的死亡率显着高于非肺炎患者(20.1%比5.8%,p <0.001)。 eMRCD在预测院内死亡率方面比CURB-65或传统MRCD量表明显更好,并且在肺炎AECOPD患者亚组中比CURB-65更强的预后工具。结论:稳定状态的呼吸困难的严重程度预示着AECOPD住院患者的重要临床结局。 eMRCD量表识别出亚组中院内死亡风险特别高的患者,并且在加重并发肺炎时比CURB-65更能预测死亡风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号