...
首页> 外文期刊>Thorax: The Journal of the British Thoracic Society >Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: Controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis.
【24h】

Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: Controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机译:减少社区获得性肺炎的上门抗生素时间:可控的前后评估和成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines suggest that all patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) should receive antibiotics within 4 h of admission. An audit at our hospital during 1999-2000 showed that this target was achieved in less than two thirds of patients with severe CAP. METHODS: An experienced multidisciplinary steering group designed a management pathway to improve the early delivery of appropriate antibiotics to patients with CAP. This was implemented using a multifaceted strategy. The effect of implementation was evaluated using a controlled before-and-after study design over two winter seasons (November-April 2001-2 and 2002-3). Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed from the hospital's perspective. RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving appropriate antibiotics within 4 h of admission to hospital increased from 33% to 56% at the intervention site, and from 32% to 36% at the control site (absolute change adjusted for differences in severity of illness 17%, p = 0.035). The cost per additional patient receiving appropriate antibiotics within 4 h was 132 pound with no post-implementation evaluation, and 456 pound for a limited post-implementation evaluation. Simple modelling from the results of a large observational study suggests that the cost per death prevented could be 3003 pound with no post-implementation evaluation, or 16,632 pound with a limited post-implementation evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention markedly improved door-to-antibiotic time, albeit at considerable cost. It might still be a cost-effective strategy, however, to reduce mortality in CAP. Uncertainty about the cost effectiveness of such interventions is likely to be resolved only by a well-designed, cluster randomised trial.
机译:背景:实践指南建议所有住院的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者应在入院后4小时内接受抗生素治疗。我们医院的一项审核(1999-2000年)显示,只有不到三分之二的严重CAP患者实现了该目标。方法:一个经验丰富的多学科指导小组设计了一种管理途径,以改善向CAP患者早期提供适当抗生素的过程。这是使用多方面的策略实现的。在两个冬季(2001年11月至4月2日和2002年3月3日),采用前后对照研究设计,评估了实施效果。从医院的角度进行了成本效益分析。结果:入院4 h内接受适当抗生素治疗的患者比例在干预部位从33%增加到56%,在对照部位从32%增加到36%(根据疾病严重程度的差异调整了绝对变化17 %,p = 0.035)。每位额外的患者在4小时内接受适当抗生素的费用为132磅(无实施后评估),为456磅(有限的实施后评估)。一项大型观察性研究结果的简单建模表明,未实施实施后的评估所能避免的每人死亡成本可能是3003磅,实施实施后的评估有限,可能会导致每人死亡的成本为16,632磅。结论:该干预措施虽然花费了可观的费用,但显着缩短了上门应用抗生素的时间。但是,降低CAP的死亡率可能仍然是一种具有成本效益的策略。只有通过精心设计的整群随机试验,才能解决此类干预措施成本效益的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号