首页> 外文期刊>The Veterinary Journal >The influence of the width of the saddle tree on the forces and the pressure distribution under the saddle
【24h】

The influence of the width of the saddle tree on the forces and the pressure distribution under the saddle

机译:鞍形树的宽度对鞍形作用力和压力分布的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As there is no statistical evidence that saddle fit influences the load exerted on a horse's back this study was performed to assess the hypothesis that the width of the tree significantly alters the pressure distribution on the back beneath the saddle. Nineteen sound horses were ridden at walk and trot on a treadmill with three saddles differing only in tree width. Kinetic data were recorded by a sensor mat. A minimum of 14 motion cycles were used in each trial. The saddles were classified into four groups depending on fit. For each horse, the saddle with the lowest overall force (LOF) was determined. Saddles were classified as "too-narrow" if they were one size (2cm) narrower than the LOF saddle, and "too-wide" if they were one size (2cm) wider than the LOF saddle. Saddles two sizes wider than LOF saddles were classified as "very-wide". In the group of narrow saddles, the pressure in the caudal third (walk 0.63N/cm(2)+/-0.10; trot 1.08N/cm(2)+/-0.26) was significantly higher compared to the LOF saddles (walk 0.50N/cm(2)+/-0.09; trot 0.86N/cm(2)+/-0.28). In the middle transversal third, the pressure of the wide saddles (walk 0.73N/cm(2)+/-0.06; trot 1.52N/cm(2)+/-0.19) and very-wide saddles (walk 0.77N/cm(2)+/-0.06; trot 1.57N/cm(2)+/-0.19) was significantly higher compared to LOF saddles (walk 0.65N/cm(2)+/-0.10/ 0.63N/cm(2)+/-0.11; trot 1.33N/cm(2)+/-0.22/1.27N/cm(2)+/-0.20). This study demonstrates that the load under poorly fitting saddles is distributed over a smaller area than under properly fitting saddles, leading to potentially harmful pressures peaks.
机译:由于没有统计证据表明鞍座适合度会影响施加在马背上的负荷,因此本研究旨在评估以下假设:树的宽度会显着改变鞍座下方背部的压力分布。 19匹有声马在步行时骑马和在跑步机上小跑,其中三只马鞍的树宽不同。动力学数据通过传感器垫记录。每个试验中至少使用14个运动周期。根据适合度,将马鞍分为四组。对于每匹马,确定的马鞍具有最低的总力(LOF)。如果鞍座比LOF鞍座窄一号(2厘米),则将其分类为“太窄”;如果鞍座比LOF鞍座宽一号(2厘米),则将其分类为“太宽”。鞍座比LOF鞍座宽两个尺寸的鞍座被分类为“非常宽”。在较窄的鞍座组中,与LOF鞍座(步行)相比,尾部第三处的压力(步行0.63N / cm(2)+/- 0.10;小跑1.08N / cm(2)+/- 0.26)明显更高0.50N / cm(2)+/- 0.09;小跑0.86N / cm(2)+/- 0.28)。在横向中间三分之一处,宽鞍座(行走0.73N / cm(2)+/- 0.06;小跑1.52N / cm(2)+/- 0.19)和超宽鞍座(行走0.77N / cm (2)+/- 0.06;小跑1.57N / cm(2)+/- 0.19)明显高于LOF马鞍(行走0.65N / cm(2)+/- 0.10 / 0.63N / cm(2)+ /-0.11;小跑1.33N / cm(2)+/- 0.22 / 1.27N / cm(2)+/- 0.20)。这项研究表明,与装配不当的鞍座相比,装配不当的鞍座下的载荷分布在较小的面积上,从而导致潜在的有害压力峰值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号