...
首页> 外文期刊>The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society >Letter to the editor regarding Mannion, Brox, Fairbank. Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: Long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Letter to the editor regarding Mannion, Brox, Fairbank. Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: Long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials.

机译:给编辑的信,涉及Mannion,Brox和Fairbank。慢性腰痛患者脊柱融合术与非手术治疗的比较:长期随访的三项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have, with interest, read in this journal the recently published article "Comparison of spinal fusion and nonop-erative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials" by Mannion, Brox, and Fairbank. We are convinced that the conclusions drawn in the article are based on a partial misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the material. In the conservative group, 40% of the patients did cross over to surgical treatment. It seems justified to expect that patients who crossed over to surgery were failures from the conservative treatment, but in the analysis of the material, the authors have not regarded this large group of failures when analyzing the ITT (intention to treat) results in the conservative group.
机译:我们有兴趣地在该杂志上阅读了Mannion,Brox和Andreas近期发表的文章“慢性腰痛患者的脊柱融合术与非手术治疗的比较:长期随访的三项随机对照试验”。费尔班克。我们相信,本文中得出的结论是基于对材料的部分误解或误解。在保守组中,有40%的患者确实接受了手术治疗。似乎有理由期望跨过手术的患者是保守治疗的失败,但是在材料分析中,作者在保守治疗中分析ITT(意图治疗)结果时并未考虑到这一大类失败组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号