首页> 外文期刊>The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society >Biomechanics of one-level anterior cervical discectomy and plating using two screws versus four screws
【24h】

Biomechanics of one-level anterior cervical discectomy and plating using two screws versus four screws

机译:使用两个螺钉对比四个螺钉进行一级前路颈椎间盘摘除和钢板的生物力学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background context: Most one-level anterior cervical plates use two screws per vertebra (four screws in total). No study has addressed whether a simplified plate using one screw per vertebra is adequate for one-level fixation. Purpose: To compare stability achieved by four-screw and two-screw plates after discectomy and placement of interbody spacer. Study design: Nondestructive multidirectional flexibility tests were performed in three independent groups of cadaveric spines to assess spinal stability after instrumentation. Methods: Human cadaveric C4-C7 specimens were tested intact and after discectomy followed by placement of a polyetheretherketone interbody graft and an anterior plate. Rigid two-screw (n=8), semiconstrained four-screw (n=8), and rigid four-screw (n=8) plates were compared. Nonconstraining pure moments were applied under load control (maximum 1.5 Nm) to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, whereas vertebral motion was measured optoelectronically. Mean range of motion (ROM) was compared among groups. Results: All three plates significantly reduced ROM relative to normal in all directions of loading (p<.003). Mean ROMs±standard deviation (and corresponding intergroup p value) for rigid two-screw, semiconstrained four-screw, and rigid four-screw plates, respectively, were as follows: flexion: 2.6±2.0°, 1.8±1.1°, 1.8±0.8° (p=.46); extension: 2.5±2.6°, 2.1±1.3°, 1.4±1.3° (p=.45); lateral bending: 1.8±1.0°, 1.3±1.0°, 1.1±0.5° (p=.29); axial rotation: 2.9±1.9°, 1.6±0.9°, 1.5±0.7° (p=.08). Despite a tendency for the rigid two-screw plate to allow more motion than the four-screw plates, there was no significant difference among groups during any loading mode. Conclusions: In terms of immediate postoperative cervical stability after one-level discectomy and placement of an interbody spacer, the rigid two-screw plate performed comparably to conventional rigid four-screw and semiconstrained four-screw plates. Further research on relative fatigue endurance of the different plate types is also needed.
机译:背景:大多数一级颈椎前板每个椎骨使用两个螺钉(总共四个螺钉)。没有研究解决每个椎骨使用一个螺钉的简化板是否足以进行一级固定。目的:比较椎间盘切除术和椎间间隔器放置后四螺钉和二螺钉板获得的稳定性。研究设计:在三个独立的尸体棘突组中进行了无损多向柔性测试,以评估器械植入后的脊柱稳定性。方法:对人体尸体C4-C7标本进行完整测试,并在椎间盘切除术后,放置聚醚醚酮椎体间植入物和前板。比较了刚性两螺钉(n = 8),半约束四螺钉(n = 8)和刚性四螺钉(n = 8)板。在负载控制下(最大1.5 Nm)施加无约束的纯力矩,以引起屈曲,伸展,横向弯曲和轴向旋转,而通过光电方式测量椎骨运动。比较各组的平均运动范围(ROM)。结果:相对于法线,所有三个板在所有加载方向上均显着降低ROM(p <.003)。刚性两螺杆,半约束四螺杆和刚性四螺杆板的平均ROMs±标准偏差(以及相应的组间p值)如下:屈曲:2.6±2.0°,1.8±1.1°,1.8± 0.8°(p = .46);延伸:2.5±2.6°,2.1±1.3°,1.4±1.3°(p = .45);横向弯曲:1.8±1.0°,1.3±1.0°,1.1±0.5°(p = .29);轴向旋转:2.9±1.9°,1.6±0.9°,1.5±0.7°(p = .08)。尽管刚性的二螺杆板允许比四螺杆板更多的运动,但是在任何加载模式下组之间都没有显着差异。结论:就一级椎间盘切除术和放置椎体间间隔物后的术后立即颈椎稳定性而言,刚性两螺钉板的性能与传统的刚性四螺钉和半约束四螺钉板相当。还需要进一步研究不同类型板的相对疲劳强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号