...
首页> 外文期刊>The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society >Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: Is intentional surgical reduction essential?
【24h】

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: Is intentional surgical reduction essential?

机译:后路腰椎椎间融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱的老年患者:有必要进行手术复位是必不可少的吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background context Surgical reduction and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is commonly used to recover segmental imbalance in degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, whether intentional reduction of the slipped vertebra during PLIF is essential in aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Purpose We compared the outcomes of surgical reduction and fusion in situ among aged patients who underwent PLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Study design A prospective randomized clinical trial on the surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis patients aged older than 70 years. Patient sample Between January 2006 and December 2009, 73 patients aged 70 years or older with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis requiring surgical treatment were included in this study. Outcome measures Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Radiographic outcomes included percentage of vertebral slippage, focal lordosis, and disc height. Methods The 73 patients were randomly assigned to two groups treated using surgical reduction (Group A, n=36) and fusion in situ (Group B, n=37). Both groups were followed up for an average of 33.2 months (range, 24-54 months). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Surgical complications were similar in the two groups. The average operative time and blood loss during surgery did not insignificantly differ (p>.05) between the two groups. Spondylolisthesis, disc height, and focal lordosis were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups. There was no obvious difference in clinical outcomes, as assessed using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, although the radiographic outcomes were considerably better in Group A than in Group B. Conclusions Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws fixation, with or without intraoperative reduction, provides good outcomes in the surgical treatment of aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Better radiological outcomes by intentional reduction do not necessarily indicate better clinical outcomes.
机译:背景技术手术复位和后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)通常用于恢复退行性腰椎滑脱的节段性失衡。然而,对于退行性腰椎滑脱的老年患者而言,是否有必要在PLIF期间故意减少椎骨滑脱是否仍然存在争议。目的我们比较了行PLIF退行性腰椎滑脱的老年患者中手术复位和原位融合的效果。研究设计前瞻性随机临床试验用于70岁以上退行性腰椎滑脱患者的手术治疗。患者样本在2006年1月至2009年12月之间,本研究纳入了73名年龄在70岁或以上的单水平退行性腰椎滑脱症需要手术治疗的患者。疗效指标使用视觉模拟量表,Oswestry残疾指数和日本骨科协会评分对临床结果进行评估。影像学结果包括椎体滑脱,局灶性脊柱前凸和椎间盘高度的百分比。方法将73例患者随机分为两组,分别采用手术复位治疗(A组,n = 36)和原位融合治疗(B组,n = 37)。两组平均随访33.2个月(24-54个月)。比较两组的临床和影像学结果。结果两组的手术并发症相似。两组的平均手术时间和手术失血量无显着差异(p> .05)。两组患者的腰椎滑脱,椎间盘高度和局灶性脊柱前凸明显改善。使用视觉模拟量表,Oswestry残疾指数和日本骨科协会评分评估的临床结局无明显差异,尽管A组的放射学结果明显好于B组。固定,无论是否进行术中复位,都可在老年退行性腰椎滑脱患者的手术治疗中提供良好的效果。通过有意识的减少而获得更好的放射学结局并不一定意味着更好的临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号