首页> 外文期刊>The Plant Engineer: The Journal of the Institution of Plant Engineers >New directions: The acrimonious debate over PC-based automation versus PLCs and distributed control systems is fading into obscurity. Now, the clever talk is of mobile, connected and cloud-based systems
【24h】

New directions: The acrimonious debate over PC-based automation versus PLCs and distributed control systems is fading into obscurity. Now, the clever talk is of mobile, connected and cloud-based systems

机译:新的方向:关于基于PC的自动化与PLC和分布式控制系统的激烈争论变得越来越模糊。现在,巧妙地谈论移动,连接和基于云的系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Was the time when almost any analysis of automation and control systems, whether for packaged machinery or end-to-end production lines, would at some point consider the pros and cons of PCs versus PLCs (programmable logic controllers). Latterly, however, arguments have largely coalesced around a general acceptance that PCs are stronger in terms of advanced programming, networking and heavyweight data crunching, whereas PLCs score on robustness and ease of use (think of the IEC 61131-3 languages, for example). But few care anymore. Why would you, when most big automation and control suppliers now offer both PC and PLC functionality in factory formats right down at the backplane level?
机译:是时候对自动化和控制系统进行几乎任何分析,无论是针对包装机械还是端到端生产线,都在某个时候考虑PC与PLC(可编程逻辑控制器)的优缺点。但是,在最近,关于普遍认为PC在高级编程,网络和重量级数据处理方面更强大,而PLC在鲁棒性和易用性方面得分很高的争论在很大程度上得到了统一(例如,以IEC 61131-3语言为例) 。但是现在很少有人在乎了。当大多数大型自动化和控制供应商现在以工厂格式同时在背板级别同时提供PC和PLC功能时,您为什么会选择呢?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号