首页> 外文期刊>The Rangeland Journal >Application of payment for ecosystem services in China's rangeland conservation initiatives: a social-ecological system perspective
【24h】

Application of payment for ecosystem services in China's rangeland conservation initiatives: a social-ecological system perspective

机译:生态系统服务付费在中国牧场保护计划中的应用:社会生态系统视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Chinese government has adopted Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) as a main approach for preventing or restoring rangelands perceived as undergoing degradation on a massive scale. Using the PES project, known as the 'retire livestock, restore rangeland' project in Alxa of Inner Mongolia as an example, the long-term ecological consequences of such projects is assessed, and the causes of the associated problems from the perspective of social-ecological system explored. Study findings demonstrate that PES, as used in the case study area, is unlikely to achieve the expected outcome of rangeland restoration in the long term. The root cause of such failure is that the PES approach focuses on end-point ecosystem services (outputs), while at the same time decoupling the feedbacks among social and ecological systems that are the key to generating such services. This drives the overall social-ecological system into an undesirable basin of attraction. It is concluded that a PES program for pastoral systems should aim to improve resilience of such a coupled social-ecological system to external shocks and changes, instead of simply maintaining ecological services without considering the origins of such services in the inter-relationship of humans and environment. It is argued that 'Payment for Ecosystem Services' should be displaced by 'Payment for Social-ecological System Resilience' in future policy discussions.
机译:中国政府已采用“生态系统服务付费”作为预防或恢复被大规模退化的牧场的主要方法。以内蒙古阿拉善的PES项目(称为“退休牲畜,恢复牧场”)项目为例,评估了此类项目的长期生态后果,并从社会视角分析了相关问题的原因。探索生态系统。研究结果表明,在案例研究区域中使用的PES不可能长期实现牧场恢复的预期成果。造成这种失败的根本原因是,生态系统服务付费方法侧重于端点生态系统服务(输出),而与此同时,社会和生态系统之间的反馈是产生这种服务的关键,因此它们之间的耦合要脱钩。这将整个社会生态系统带入一个令人讨厌的吸引盆。结论是,针对牧草系统的生态系统服务计划应旨在提高这种耦合的社会生态系统对外部冲击和变化的适应力,而不是简单地维持生态服务,而无需在人类和人类之间的相互关系中考虑此类服务的起源。环境。有人认为,在未来的政策讨论中,“为生态系统服务付费”应该被“为社会生态系统弹性付费”所取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号