首页> 外文期刊>The Psychiatric Clinics of North America >The soft bipolar spectrum redefined: focus on the cyclothymic, anxious-sensitive, impulse-dyscontrol, and binge-eating connection in bipolar II and related conditions.
【24h】

The soft bipolar spectrum redefined: focus on the cyclothymic, anxious-sensitive, impulse-dyscontrol, and binge-eating connection in bipolar II and related conditions.

机译:重新定义了软双极谱:专注于双极II和相关条件下的环胸腺,焦虑敏感,冲动失控和暴食饮食连接。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The bipolar II spectrum represents the most common phenotype of bipolarity. Numerous studies indicate that in clinical settings this soft spectrum might be as common--if not more common than--major depressive disorders. The proportion of depressive patients who can be classified as bipolar II further increases if the 4-day threshold for hypomania proposed by the DSM-IV is reconsidered. The modal duration of hypomanic episodes is 2 days; highly recurrent brief hypomania is as short as 1 day, and when complicated by major depression, it should be classified as a variant of bipolar II. Another variant of the bipolar II pattern is represented by major depressive episodes superimposed on cyclothymic or hyperthymic temperamental characteristics. The literature is unanimous in supporting the idea that depressed patients who experience hypomania during antidepressant treatment belong to the bipolar II spectrum. So-called alcohol- or substance-induced mood disorders may have much in common with bipolar II spectrum disorders, in particular when mood swings outlast detoxification. Finally, many patients within the bipolar II spectrum, especially when recurrence is high and the interepisodic period is not free of affective manifestations, may meet criteria for personality disorders. This is particularly true for cyclothymic bipolar II patients, who are often misclassified as borderline personality disorder because of their extreme mood instability. Subthreshold mood lability of a cyclothymic nature seems to be the common thread that links the soft bipolar spectrum. The authors submit this to represent the endophenotype likely to be informative in genetic investigations. Mood lability can be considered the core characteristics of the bipolar II spectrum, and it has been validated prospectively as a sensitive and specific predictor of bipolar II outcome in major depressives. In a more hypothetical vein, cyclothymic-anxious-sensitive temperamental disposition might represent the mediating underlying characteristic in the complex pattern of anxiety, mood, and impulsive disorders that bipolar II spectrum patients display throughout much of their lifetimes. The foregoing conclusions, based on clinical experience and the research literature, challenge several conventions in the formal classificatory system (i.e., ICD-10 and DSM-IV). The authors submit that the enlargement of classical bipolar II disorders to include a spectrum of conditions subsumed by a cyclothymic-anxious-sensitive disposition, with mood reactivity and interpersonal sensitivity, and ranging from mood, anxiety, impulse control, and eating disorders, will greatly enhance clinical practice and research endeavors. Prospective studies with the requisite methodologic sophistication are needed to clarify further the relationship of the putative temperamental and developmental variables to the complex syndromic patterns described herein. The authors believe that viewing these constructs as related entities with a common temperamental diathesis will make patients in this realm more accessible to pharmacologic and psychological approaches geared to their common temperamental attributes. The authors submit that the use of the term "spectrum" is distinct from a simple continuum of subthreshold and threshold cases. The underlying temperamental dimensions postulated by the authors define the disposition for soft bipolarity and its variation and dysregulation in anxious disorders and dyscontrol in appetitive, mental, and behavioral disorders, much beyond affective disorders in the narrow sense.
机译:双极性II谱表示双极性的最常见表型。大量研究表明,在临床环境中,这种软频谱可能与主要抑郁症一样普遍(如果不普遍)。如果重新考虑DSM-IV提出的4天低躁狂阈值,则可归为躁郁症II型抑郁症患者的比例会进一步增加。躁狂发作的持续时间为2天;高度反复发作的短暂性轻躁狂仅需1天,而并发重度抑郁时,应归类为双相性II型。双极型II型的另一种变异表现为重度抑郁发作,叠加在环胸腺或高胸腺的气质特征上。文献一致支持在抗抑郁治疗期间经历轻躁狂的抑郁患者属于双相II型谱的观点。所谓的酒精性或物质性情绪障碍可能与双相II型频谱障碍有很多共同点,尤其是当情绪波动超过排毒时间时。最后,在双相II型谱内的许多患者,特别是当复发率高且间隔间期并非没有情感表现时,可能符合人格障碍的标准。对于双侧胸腺性双相情感障碍患者,尤其如此,由于极端的情绪不稳定,他们经常被归类为边缘性人格障碍。阈下的具有环胸腺性的情绪不稳定似乎是联系软双极谱的共同点。作者认为这代表了可能在遗传研究中提供信息的内表型。情绪不稳定可以被认为是双相II型谱的核心特征,并且已被前瞻性验证为主要抑郁症中双相II结局的灵敏和特异性预测因子。以更假设的方式,对双极性II谱患者在其一生中都表现出的焦虑,情绪和冲动障碍的复杂模式中,环胸腺焦虑敏感的气质性可能代表了潜在的中介特征。基于临床经验和研究文献的上述结论对正式分类系统中的若干约定(即ICD-10和DSM-IV)提出了挑战。作者认为,将经典的双相情感障碍II扩大到包括一系列由胸腺性焦虑敏感的情绪所引起的疾病,以及情绪反应和人际关系敏感,范围从情绪,焦虑,冲动控制和饮食失调,将非常重要。加强临床实践和研究工作。需要用必要的方法学技巧进行前瞻性研究,以进一步阐明推定的气质和发育变量与本文所述复杂综合征模式的关系。作者认为,将这些结构视为具有共同的气质特征的相关实体,将使该领域的患者更容易使用针对其共同气质特征的药理和心理方法。作者认为,“频谱”一词的使用不同于阈值以下和阈值情况的简单连续体。作者推测的基本气质维度定义了软性双相性的倾向及其在焦虑症中的变异和失调以及在食欲,精神和行为障碍中的失控,远远超出了狭义上的情感障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号