首页> 外文期刊>The Royal engineers journal >Post Conflict Reconstruction - Why is Transition to Civilian Management so Disjointed? (Report on the Joint Professional Meeting with the Institution of Civil Engineers)
【24h】

Post Conflict Reconstruction - Why is Transition to Civilian Management so Disjointed? (Report on the Joint Professional Meeting with the Institution of Civil Engineers)

机译:冲突后重建-为什么向平民管理的过渡如此脱节? (与土木工程师学会联合专业会议的报告)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

THE conflict in Iraq has been discussed on the pages of this Journal in great detail in recent RE Journals, particularly in the December 2004 edition. However, the conflict in Iraq is far from over and only at the end of June 2004 did Iraqis regain control of their destiny and the reconstruction of the nation. Politically in UK we may not have "invaded" Iraq, nor were we a force of "occupation", although many in this country and Iraq do not agree that line. Indeed it could be argued that this political attitude directly led to the lack of planning for a post war Iraq that most commentators seem agreed upon.
机译:最近的RE期刊,特别是2004年12月版,在本期刊的页面上对伊拉克冲突进行了详细讨论。但是,伊拉克的冲突还远没有结束,直到2004年6月底,伊拉克人才重新控制了自己的命运和国家重建。在英国,从政治上讲,我们可能没有“入侵”伊拉克,也没有“占领”力量,尽管该国和伊拉克的许多人不同意这一路线。确实可以说,这种政治态度直接导致缺乏对大多数评论员似乎都同意的战后伊拉克的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号