首页> 外文期刊>The journal of family planning and reproductive health care >Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy
【24h】

Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy

机译:因果,偏见和混淆:流行病学银河系旅行者指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The focus in this review is on exposed and non-exposed, and diseased and non-diseased, individuals ('categorical variables'). The statistical assessment of measurements made on a continuous scale ('continuous variables') (e.g. mean height or weight) is not considered.Confidence in causality is strengthened if an association is stable: that is, if the numbers (the numerators and denominators of the compared rates) are sufficient to rule out chance ('sampling error') with reasonable confidence. By convention, 'confidence' is estimated by setting a confidence interval (CI) ('confidence limits') around the relative risk (RR) estimate ('point estimate').
机译:本文的重点是接触者和非接触者,患病者和非患病者(“分类变量”)。不考虑对连续量表(“连续变量”)(例如平均身高或体重)进行统计评估。如果关联是稳定的,即如果数字(分子的分子和分母),则因果关系的信心会增强。比较率)足以以合理的置信度排除机会(“抽样误差”)。按照惯例,通过围绕相对风险(RR)估计值(“点估计值”)设置置信区间(CI)(“置信范围”)来估计“置信度”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号