...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Experimental Biology >Cardiac preload and venous return in swimming sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.)
【24h】

Cardiac preload and venous return in swimming sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.)

机译:游泳鲈鱼(Dicentrarchus labrax L.)的心脏预紧和静脉回流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cardiac preload (central venous pressure, P(CV), mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), dorsal aortic blood pressure (P(DA)) and relative cardiac output (Q) were measured in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) at rest and while swimming at 1 and 2 BL s(-1). MCFP, an index of venous capacitance and the upstream venous pressure driving the return of venous blood to the heart, was measured as the plateau in Pcv during ventral aortic occlusion. Compared with resting values, swimming at 1 and 2 BL s(-1) increased Q (by 15+/-1.5 and 38+/-6.5%, respectively), P(CV) (from 0.11+/-0.01 kPa to 0.12+/-0.01 and 0.16+/-0.02 kPa, respectively), MCFP (from 0.27+/-0.02 kPa to 0.31+/-0.02 and 0.40+/-0.04 kPa, respectively) and the calculated pressure gradient for venous return (DeltaP(V), from 0.16+/-0.01 kPa to 0.18+/-0.02 and 0.24+/-0.02 kPa, respectively), but not P(DA). In spite of an increased preload, the increase in Q was exclusively mediated by an increased heart rate (f(H), from 80+/-4 beats min(-1) to 88+/-4 and 103+/-3 beats min(-1), respectively), and stroke volume (Vs) remained unchanged. Prazosin treatment (1 mg kg(-1) Mb) abolished pressure and flow changes during swimming at 1 BL s(-1), but not 2 BL s(-1), indicating that other control systems besides an alpha-adrenoceptor control are involved. This study is the first to address the control of venous capacitance in swimming fish. It questions the generality that increased Q during swimming is regulated primarily through Vs and shows that an increased cardiac filling pressure does not necessarily lead to an increased Vs in fish, but may instead compensate for a reduced cardiac filling time.
机译:在静息和静息状态下,在鲈鱼(Dicentrarchus labrax)中测量心脏的预负荷(中心静脉压,P(CV),平均循环充盈压(MCFP),主动脉背压(P(DA))和相对心输出量(Q)。在1和2 BL s(-1)时游泳,MCFP是驱动腹主动脉闭塞过程中Pcv的平稳期,它是衡量静脉电容的指数和驱动静脉血返回心脏的上游静脉压力的指标。 ,以1和2 BL s(-1)游泳会增加Q(分别增加15 +/- 1.5和38 +/- 6.5%),P(CV)(从0.11 +/- 0.01 kPa到0.12 +/- 0.01和分别为0.16 +/- 0.02 kPa),MCFP(分别从0.27 +/- 0.02 kPa到0.31 +/- 0.02和0.40 +/- 0.04 kPa)和计算得出的静脉回流压力梯度(DeltaP(V),分别从0.16 +/- 0.01 kPa到0.18 +/- 0.02和0.24 +/- 0.02 kPa),而不是P(DA)。尽管预紧力增加,但Q的增加完全是由心率增加所介导的(f(H),至少80 +/- 4拍(-1)分别为min(-1)到88 +/- 4和103 +/- 3拍),并且搏动量(Vs)保持不变。 Prazosin处理(1 mg kg(-1)Mb)消除了在1 BL s(-1)游泳时的压力和流量变化,但没有消除2 BL s(-1)的游泳过程中的压力和流量变化,表明除α-肾上腺素受体控制外,其他控制系统参与。这项研究是第一个解决游泳鱼类静脉容量控制的研究。它质疑普遍性,即游泳中Q的增加主要是通过Vs来调节的,并且表明增加的心脏充盈压力并不一定导致鱼的Vs升高,而是可以弥补减少的心脏充盈时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号