首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Experimental Biology >IN VIVO MUSCLE FORCE AND ELASTIC ENERGY STORAGE DURING STEADY-SPEED HOPPING OF TAMMAR WALLABIES (MACROPUS EUGENII)
【24h】

IN VIVO MUSCLE FORCE AND ELASTIC ENERGY STORAGE DURING STEADY-SPEED HOPPING OF TAMMAR WALLABIES (MACROPUS EUGENII)

机译:淡淡淡淡的淡淡睡袋(马RO鱼)稳态跳跃过程中的体内肌肉力量和弹性能量存储

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to evaluate the role of elastic energy recovery in the hopping of macropodids, in vivo measurements of muscle-tendon forces using buckle force transducers attached to the tendons of the gastrocnemius (G), plantaris (PL) and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) of tammar wallabies were made as the animals hopped on a treadmill at speeds ranging from 2.1 to 6.3 m s(-1). These muscles and tendons constitute the main structures that are most important in energy storage and recovery, Electromyographic recordings from the lateral gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles, together with highspeed films (200 frames s(-1)) and video (60 fields s(-1)), were also used to correlate muscle activation and kinematic patterns of limb movement with force development, On the basis of in situ calibrations of the buckle transducers, we found that muscle forces and elastic energy storage increased with increased hopping speed in all three muscle-tendon units, Elastic energy recovery reached a maximum of 25% of metabolic energy expenditure at 6.3 m s(-1) and is probably greater than this at higher speeds, Force sharing among the three muscles was consistently maintained over this range of speeds in terms of recruitment, Although forces and stresses were generally comparable within the gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles, maximal tendon stresses were considerably greater in the gastrocnemius, because of its smaller cross-sectional area (peak muscle stress: 227 versus 262kPa; peak tendon stress: 36 versus 32MPa, G versus FL). As a result, energy storage was greatest in the gastrocnemius tendon despite its much shorter length, which limits its volume and, hence, energy storage capacity, compared with PL and FDL tendons, Forces and stresses (17MPa maximum) developed within the FDL tendon were consistently much lower than those for the other two tendons, Peak stresses in these three tendons indicated safety factors of 3.0 for G, 3.3 for PL and 6.0 for FDL, The lower stresses developed within the tendons of the plantaris and, especially, the flexor digitorum longus may indicate the need to maintain sufficient stiffness for phalangeal control of foot placement, at the expense of reduced strain energy recovery. [References: 37]
机译:为了评估弹性能量恢复在巨足类动物跳跃中的作用,使用附着在腓肠肌(G),plant肌(PL)和趾长屈肌(FDL)的肌腱上的带扣力传感器在体内测量肌腱力当动物在跑步机上以2.1到6.3 ms(-1)的速度跳动时,制作了tammar小袋鼠。这些肌肉和腱构成能量存储和恢复中最重要的主要结构,腓肠肌外侧和plant肌的肌电图记录,以及高速胶片(200帧s(-1))和视频(60场s(-1 )),还用于将肌肉激活和肢体运动的运动学模式与力量发展相关联,在对扣式传感器进行原位校准的基础上,我们发现,在所有三个肌肉中,肌肉力量和弹性能量存储都随着跳动速度的增加而增加肌腱单位,在6.3毫秒(-1)时弹性能量恢复最大达到新陈代谢能量消耗的25%,并且在较高速度下可能大于此能量。就此而言,在此速度范围内,三块肌肉之间的力共享始终保持不变尽管腓肠肌和足底肌的力量和压力通常是可比的,但最大肌腱压力在腓肠肌和plant肌中却相当。腓肠肌,因为其横截面积较小(峰值肌肉压力:227对262kPa;峰值肌腱应力:36对32MPa,G对FL)。结果,尽管腓肠肌腱的长度短得多,但其能量存储最大,这限制了其体积,因此,与PL和FDL肌腱相比,能量存储能力有限,FDL肌腱内产生的力和应力(最大17MPa)是最大的。始终远低于其他两个腱的应力,这三个腱的峰值应力表明G的安全系数为3.0,PL的安全系数为3.3,FDL的安全系数为6.0,足底肌腱特别是指趾屈肌内的应力较低Longus可能表明需要保持足够的刚度来控制脚的趾骨位置,但要以降低应变能的回收为代价。 [参考:37]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号