...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Experimental Biology >Parameters of variable reward distributions that affect risk sensitivity of honey bees
【24h】

Parameters of variable reward distributions that affect risk sensitivity of honey bees

机译:影响蜜蜂风险敏感性的可变奖励分配参数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigated risk sensitivity with harnessed honey bees in a proboscis-extension conditioning paradigm. We conditioned each subject to turn its head and extend its proboscis towards one of two presented odors; one odor was associated with a constant reward and the other with a variable reward that was either low or high, with probabilities P and (1-P), respectively. Reward values and probabilities were set so that the expected value of the variable alternative was equal to that of the constant one. We performed six experimental conditions in which variability was in reward volume and three conditions in which variability was in reward concentration. The experiments were designed to systematically test the effect of various parameters that describe the reward distributions on levels of risk sensitivity. Risk aversion was greatest when variability was in reward volume, and the variable distribution included zero rewards and had a high coefficient of variation (CV=s.d./mean). The variance itself did not affect risk sensitivity. Subjects were risk indifferent when the variable distribution did not include zero rewards, however these distributions were positively skewed. The independent effects of zero rewards and distribution skew remain to be tested. Subjects were risk indifferent in conditions where variability was in reward concentration, but concentration range was limited and these distributions did not include zero rewards and were skewed. We conclude that risk aversion to variability in reward amount is a robust phenomenon for some reward distributions. A systematic evaluation of the effect of various reward distribution parameters on choice behavior should complement functional and mechanistic approaches.
机译:我们调查了在象鼻-延长条件范式中利用蜜蜂对风险的敏感性。我们让每个对象转过头,将其鼻向两个提出的气味之一延伸。一种气味与持续的奖励有关,另一种气味与低或高的可变奖励有关,分别具有概率P和(1-P)。设置了奖励值和概率,以使变量替代方案的期望值等于常量替代方案的期望值。我们进行了六个实验条件,其中奖励量具有可变性,而三个条件中的奖励浓度具有可变性。实验旨在系统地测试描述奖励分布对风险敏感性水平的各种参数的影响。当奖励量具有可变性时,风险规避最大,变量分布包括零奖励且具有高变异系数(CV = s.d. /平均值)。差异本身并不影响风险敏感性。当变量分布不包括零奖励时,受试者的风险漠不关心,但是这些分布呈正偏态。零奖励和分配偏斜的独立影响仍有待检验。在奖励集中存在可变性的情况下,受试者的风险无动于衷,但是集中范围有限,并且这些分布不包括零奖励,并且存在偏差。我们得出的结论是,对于某些奖励分配,对奖励金额变化的风险规避是一个强有力的现象。对各种奖励分配参数对选择行为的影响进行系统的评估应补充功能和机制方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号