首页> 外文期刊>The Quarterly Journal of Economics >WHY ARE MOST FUNDS OPEN-END? COMPETITION AND THE LIMITS OF ARBITRAGE*
【24h】

WHY ARE MOST FUNDS OPEN-END? COMPETITION AND THE LIMITS OF ARBITRAGE*

机译:为什么大多数资金都是开放式的?竞争和套利限制*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The majority of asset-management intermediaries (e.g., mutual funds, hedge funds) are structured on an open-end basis, even though it appears that the open-end form can be a serious impediment to arbitrage. I argue that when funds compete to attract investors' dollars, the equilibrium degree of open-ending in an economy can be excessive from the point of view of these investors. One implication of the analysis is that, even absent short-sales constraints or other frictions, economically large mispricings can coexist with rational, competitive arbitrageurs who earn small excess returns.
机译:大多数资产管理中介机构(例如共同基金,对冲基金)都是开放式的,即使开放式形式似乎严重阻碍套利。我认为,当基金竞争吸引投资者的资金时,从这些投资者的角度来看,经济中开放式交易的均衡程度可能过高。该分析的一个含义是,即使没有短线销售限制或其他摩擦,经济上较大的定价错误也可能与赚取少量超额收益的理性竞争性套利者并存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号