首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Physiology >Rebuttal from Jens Jordan
【24h】

Rebuttal from Jens Jordan

机译:来自延斯·乔丹的反驳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The new interventional treatments discussed in this CrossTalk debate address fundamental physiological mechanisms regulating autonomic nervous system activity and blood pressure, namely renal innervation, peripheral chemo-receptors, or carotid baroreflexes. The solid physiological rationale behind catheter-based renal denervation (Ratcliffe et al. 2014) and carotid chemoreceptor denervation/modulation (Schlaich et al. 2014) has been reviewed by a group of internationally recognized experts in the field. There is not much I could add. I would argue that catheter-based renal denervation, carotid chemoreceptor denervation/modulation and electrical carotid sinus stimulation deserved to undergo rigorous clinical testing. However, the road from a good idea to an effective treatment that can be incorporated into routine clinical care is a long one.
机译:在此次CrossTalk辩论中讨论的新的介入治疗方法针对调节自主神经系统活动和血压的基本生理机制,即肾脏神经支配,外周化学受体或颈动脉压力反射。一组基于导管的肾脏去神经(Ratcliffe等,2014)和颈动脉化学感受器去神经/调节(Schlaich等,2014)背后的扎实的生理学原理已经得到了该领域的国际公认专家的审查。我没有什么可以补充的。我认为基于导管的肾脏去神经,颈动脉化学感受器去神经/调节和颈动脉窦电刺激值得进行严格的临床测试。但是,从好的想法到可以被纳入常规临床护理的有效治疗之路是漫长的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号