...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Physiology >The ventral tegmental area revisited: is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons?
【24h】

The ventral tegmental area revisited: is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons?

机译:再次探讨腹侧被盖区:是否存在多巴胺能神经元的电生理标记?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The ventral tegmental area (VTA) and in particular VTA dopamine (DA) neurons are postulated to play a central role in reward, motivation and drug addiction. However, most evidence implicating VTA DA neurons in these functions is based on indirect electrophysiological characterization, rather than cytochemical identification. These physiological criteria were first established in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), but their validity in the VTA is uncertain. In the current study we found that while 88 +/- 2% of SNc neurons labelled by the neuronal marker NeuN were co-labelled for the catecholamine enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a much smaller percentage (55 +/- 2%) of VTA neurons co-expressed TH. In addition, using in vitro whole-cell recordings we found that widely accepted physiological criteria for VTA DA neurons, including the hyperpolarization-activated inwardly rectifying non-specific cation current (I(h)), spike duration, and inhibition by DA D2 receptor agonists, do not reliably predictthe DA content of VTA neurons. We could not distinguish DA neurons from other VTA neurons by size, shape, input resistance, I(h) size, or spontaneous firing rate. Although the absence of an I(h) reliably predicted that a VTA neuron was non-dopaminergic, and I(h)(-) neurons differ from I(h)(+) neurons in firing rate, interspike interval (ISI) standard deviation, and ISI skew, no physiological property examined here is both sensitive and selective for DA neurons in the VTA. We conclude that reliable physiological criteria for VTA DA neuron identification have yet to be determined, and that the criteria currently being used are unreliable.
机译:假定腹侧被盖区(VTA),尤其是VTA多巴胺(DA)神经元在奖励,动机和药物成瘾中起着核心作用。但是,大多数暗示VTA DA神经元具有这些功能的证据是基于间接电生理学表征,而不是细胞化学鉴定。这些生理标​​准首先在黑质致密部(SNc)中建立,但在VTA中的有效性尚不确定。在当前的研究中,我们发现,虽然神经元标记NeuN标记的SNc神经元有88 +/- 2%被共同标记为儿茶酚胺酶酪氨酸羟化酶(TH),但神经元的百分比却很小(55 +/- 2%) VTA神经元共表达TH。此外,使用体外全细胞记录,我们发现VTA DA神经元被广泛接受的生理标准,包括超极化激活的内向整流非特异性阳离子电流(I(h)),尖峰持续时间和DA D2受体的抑制作用激动剂,不能可靠地预测VTA神经元的DA含量。我们无法通过大小,形状,输入阻力,I(h)大小或自发放电率将DA神经元与其他VTA神经元区分开。尽管没有I(h)可以可靠地预测VTA神经元是非多巴胺能的,并且I(h)(-)神经元的放电速率,尖峰间间隔(ISI)标准差与I(h)(+)神经元不同和ISI偏斜,此处检查的生理特性对VTA中的DA神经元既不敏感也不具有选择性。我们得出的结论是,尚未确定用于VTA DA神经元识别的可靠生理标准,并且当前使用的标准不可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号