首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Noninvasive pulse CO-oximetry expedites evaluation and management of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning
【24h】

Noninvasive pulse CO-oximetry expedites evaluation and management of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning

机译:无创脉搏血氧饱和度测定法可加快一氧化碳中毒患者的评估和治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purposes: Pulse CO-oximetry (Rad-57; Masimo Corp, Irvine, CA) has been available since 2005. To date, all published clinical studies have focused on clinical reliability and whether the device enhances case finding through screening of various populations. This study examines whether use of pulse CO-oximetry shortens the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. Basic Procedures: Data from the joint Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CO poisoning surveillance system from August 2008 to July 2011 were analyzed. Of 1711 cases of CO poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen in the United States and reported through the system, 1606 had their initial carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level measured by laboratory CO-oximetry and 105 by pulse CO-oximetry. Patients were selected from the laboratory CO-oximetry group to match each of the 105 patients evaluated by pulse CO-oximetry in 5 characteristics - age, sex, race/ethnicity, intent of poisoning, and occurrence of loss of consciousness. Measures of timeliness in measurement and management were compared between the 2 groups. Main Findings: Patients with initial COHb measurement by pulse CO-oximetry had significantly shorter time to measurement of COHb, higher average levels of COHb, and shorter time from the end of CO exposure to the initiation of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. On average, patients evaluated by pulse CO-oximetry reached the hyperbaric chamber 1 hour faster than did patients evaluated by laboratory CO-oximetry (P <.01). Principle Conclusions: Pulse CO-oximetry is associated with more rapid diagnosis and initiation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in CO-poisoned patients compared with laboratory CO-oximetry. The impact on clinical outcome remains to be determined.
机译:目的:脉冲CO血氧测定法(Rad-57; Masimo Corp,加利福尼亚州欧文)自2005年开始可用。迄今为止,所有已发表的临床研究都集中在临床可靠性以及该设备是否通过筛选各种人群来增强病例发现方面。这项研究探讨了使用脉冲CO血氧测定法是否可以缩短诊断和治疗一氧化碳(CO)中毒患者的时间。基本程序:分析了海底和高压医学会/疾病控制与预防中心联合中毒监测系统从2008年8月至2011年7月的数据。在通过系统报告的美国高压氧治疗的1711例CO中毒病例中,有1606例的初始羧基血红蛋白(COHb)水平通过实验室CO-血氧测定法测量,而105例通过脉冲CO血氧测定法测量。从实验室CO血氧测定法组中选择患者,以匹配通过脉冲CO血氧测定法评估的105例患者中的每一个患者的5个特征-年龄,性别,种族/民族,中毒意图和意识丧失的发生。比较两组之间在测量和管理方面的及时性。主要发现:通过脉冲CO血氧饱和度法进行初始COHb测量的患者的COHb测量时间明显缩短,平均COHb水平更高,并且从结束CO暴露到开始高压氧治疗的时间更短。平均而言,通过脉冲CO血氧定量法评估的患者比通过实验室CO血氧定量法评估的患者快1小时到达高压舱(P <.01)。原理结论:与实验室CO血氧测定法相比,脉冲CO血氧测定法可以更快速地诊断和启动CO中毒患者进行高压氧治疗。对临床结果的影响尚待确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号