...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights.
【24h】

Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights.

机译:Broselow卷尺测量值与儿科医师体重估计值的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the agreement of physician estimates compared with Broselow tape measurements in accurately determining children's weights. Our secondary objective was to evaluate whether physician adjustment of the Broselow tape weight measurement is a better estimate of pediatric weight compared with either method alone. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary children's hospital. Children between the ages of 0 and 14 years consecutively registered in the pediatric ED were eligible for enrollment. Height, weight, body mass index, and Broselow tape measurement were obtained for all subjects. Blinded ED physicians provided estimates for weight and body habitus for enrolled subjects. Physicians next were given the Broselow weight measurement and then submitted a second, amended estimate (hybrid). Percentage differences were used to analyze the discrepancy between estimates and actual weight. Specifically examined were the proportion of estimates that fell within 10% of the patients' actual body weights. RESULTS: A total of 372 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 45.7 months, mean body mass index was 17.4, mean weight was 16.8 kg, and 39 participants (18.1%) met the definition for obese. Broselow estimates were within 10% of actual weight 63% of the time, physician estimates were within 10% of the actual weight 43% of the time and hybrid estimates 55% of the time. Based on average mean percent error, compared with actual weight, Broselow differed by 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7-12), hybrid estimate by 11.3% (95% CI, 10.3-12.2), and physician estimate by 16.2% (95% CI, 14.7-17.7). The Broselow tape was significantly worse than physician estimate for obese patients: 26.4% (95% CI, 19.7-33.1) versus 16.0% (95% CI, 12.3-19.8). CONCLUSION: The Broselow tape generally has greater agreement with actual weight than physician visual estimation, except for obese children. Physician adjustment of the Broselow measurement also proved to be comparable to the Broselow tape.
机译:目的:我们试图确定医师估计值与Broselow卷尺测量值之间的一致性,以准确确定儿童的体重。我们的第二个目标是评估与单独使用任何一种方法相比,医生对Broselow胶带重量测量值的调整是否更好地估计了儿科体重。方法:这项横断面研究是在三级儿童医院的急诊科进行的。在小儿急诊科连续登记的0至14岁的儿童符合入学条件。获得了所有受试者的身高,体重,体重指数和Broselow卷尺。盲目ED医师为入选受试者提供了体重和身体习惯的估计值。接下来,对医生进行Broselow体重测量,然后提交第二次修订的估算值(混合)。使用百分比差异来分析估计值与实际重量之间的差异。专门检查的估计值所占比例不超过患者实际体重的10%。结果:共有372名受试者符合入选标准。平均年龄为45.7个月,平均体重指数为17.4,平均体重为16.8千克,有39名参与者(18.1%)符合肥胖的定义。 Broselow估计在63%的时间内处于实际体重的10%以内,医师估计在43%的时间内在实际体重的10%以内,而杂种动物的估计在55%的时间内。根据平均平均误差百分比,与实际重量相比,Broselow相差10.8%(95%置信区间[CI],9.7-12),混合估计相差11.3%(95%CI,10.3-12.2),而医师估计相差16.2%(95%CI,14.7-17.7)。肥胖患者的Broselow胶带明显差于医生的估计:26.4%(95%CI,19.7-33.1)对16.0%(95%CI,12.3-19.8)。结论:除了肥胖儿童以外,与医生的目测估计值相比,Broselow胶带与实际重量的一致性更高。 Broselow测量的医师调整也被证明与Broselow胶带相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号