首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents in contemporary clinical practice

机译:在当代临床实践中,与第一代药物洗脱支架相比,XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架的安全性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Data from randomized clinical trials have shown the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V in selected populations. However, limited data are available comparing the XIENCE V to the first-generation CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent. This study aimed to assess the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent compared to first-generation stents in an unselected patient population. This retrospective analysis included 6,069 patients treated with CYPHER, TAXUS, and XIENCE stents from 2003 to 2009 at our institution. The patients were followed up for ≥1 year after the index procedure. The baseline characteristics were generally comparable among the 3 groups, with the exception of a significantly greater prevalence of diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, and a history of angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery among the XIENCE patients. The XIENCE patients also had a twofold greater rate of type C lesions. One-year follow-up data were available for 82% of the patients. The 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 9.3% for the XIENCE stent versus 9.8% for the CYPHER stent and 11.5% for the TAXUS stent (p = 0.11). Mortality was lower in the XIENCE group than in the CYPHER and TAXUS groups (3.6% vs 4.9% vs 7.2%, respectively, p <0.001), and target lesion revascularization was similar (5.9% vs 5.2% vs 5.6%, respectively; p = 0.34). Stent thrombosis was lower in the XIENCE patients (0.2% vs 1.2% vs 0.7%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, in a contemporary United States clinical practice with an unselected patient population, use of the XIENCE V stent was associated with an improved safety profile and reduction of all-cause mortality and stent thrombosis compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents. The XIENCE V failed to demonstrate superiority for overall major adverse cardiovascular events, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates.
机译:随机临床试验的数据显示了XIENCE V在选定人群中的安全性和有效性。但是,将XIENCE V与第一代CYPHER西罗莫司洗脱支架进行比较的可用数据有限。这项研究旨在评估在未选择的患者人群中,与第一代支架相比,XIENCE V依维莫司洗脱支架的长期安全性和临床疗效。这项回顾性分析包括2003年至2009年在我们机构使用CYPHER,TAXUS和XIENCE支架治疗的6,069例患者。索引程序后对患者进行≥1年的随访。三组患者的基线特征基本可比,但XIENCE患者中糖尿病,全身性高血压的患病率明显更高,并且有血管成形术和冠状动脉搭桥手术史。 XIENCE患者的C型病变发生率也增加了两倍。 82%的患者可获得一年的随访数据。 XIENCE支架的1年主要不良心血管事件发生率为9.3%,而CYPHER支架为9.8%,TAXUS支架为11.5%(p = 0.11)。 XIENCE组的死亡率低于CYPHER和TAXUS组(分别为3.6%vs 4.9%vs 7.2%,p <0.001),靶病变血运重建相似(分别为5.9%vs 5.2%vs 5.6%; p = 0.34)。 XIENCE患者的支架血栓形成较低(0.2%vs. 1.2%vs 0.7%,p = 0.007)。总之,在当代美国临床实践中,未选择患者人群的情况下,与第一代药物洗脱支架相比,使用XIENCE V支架可改善安全性,并降低全因死亡率和支架血栓形成。 XIENCE V未能显示出对总体主要不良心血管事件,Q波心肌梗塞和血运重建率的优越性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号