首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes.
【24h】

Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes.

机译:根据Medicare III类交易代码的分析,在没有已知冠状动脉疾病的个体中进行冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术的成本和临床结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) demonstrates high accuracy for the detection and exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD) and predicts adverse prognosis. To date, opportunity costs relating the clinical and economic outcomes of CCTA compared with other methods of diagnosing CAD, such as myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), remain unknown. An observational, multicenter, patient-level analysis of patients without known CAD who underwent CCTA or SPECT was performed. Patients who underwent CCTA (n = 1,938) were matched to those who underwent SPECT (n = 7,752) on 8 demographic and clinical characteristics and 2 summary measures of cardiac medications and co-morbidities and were evaluated for 9-month expenditures and clinical outcomes. Adjusted total health care and CAD expenditures were 27% (p <0.001) and 33% (p <0.001) lower, respectively, for patients who underwent CCTA compared with those who underwent SPECT, by an average of Dollars 467 (95% confidence interval Dollars 99 to Dollars 984) for CAD expenditures per patient. Despite lower total health care expenditures for CCTA, no differences were observed for rates of adverse cardiovascular events, including CAD hospitalizations (4.2% vs 4.1%, p = NS), CAD outpatient visits (17.4% vs 13.3%, p = NS), myocardial infarction (0.4% vs 0.6%, p = NS), and new-onset angina (3.0% vs 3.5%, p = NS). Patients without known CAD who underwent CCTA, compared with matched patients who underwent SPECT, incurred lower overall health care and CAD expenditures while experiencing similarly low rates of CAD hospitalization, outpatient visits, myocardial infarction, and angina. In conclusion, these data suggest that CCTA may be a cost-efficient alternative to SPECT for the initial coronary evaluation of patients without known CAD.
机译:多探测器冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术(CCTA)表现出对冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的检测和排除的高精度,并预测不良预后。迄今为止,与其他诊断CAD的方法(例如心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT))相比,与CCTA的临床和经济结果相关的机会成本仍然未知。对没有已知CAD的CCTA或SPECT患者进行了观察性,多中心,患者水平的分析。接受CCTA(n = 1938)的患者与接受SPECT(n = 7752)的患者在8项人口统计学和临床​​特征以及2项心脏药物和合并症的汇总指标方面进行了匹配,并评估了9个月的支出和临床结果。进行CCTA治疗的患者与进行SPECT治疗的患者相比,调整后的总医疗保健和CAD支出分别降低了27%(p <0.001)和33%(p <0.001),平均降低了467美元(95%置信区间)每位患者的CAD支出为99美元到984美元)。尽管CCTA的总医疗保健支出较低,但心血管不良事件发生率没有差异,包括CAD住院(4.2%vs 4.1%,p = NS),CAD门诊就诊(17.4%vs 13.3%,p = NS),心肌梗塞(0.4%vs. 0.6%,p = NS)和新发性心绞痛(3.0%vs 3.5%,p = NS)。与进行SPECT的配对患者相比,没有进行过CCTA检查的CAD患者的总体医疗保健和CAD支出较低,而CAD住院,门诊就诊,心肌梗塞和心绞痛的发生率也较低。总之,这些数据表明,对于没有已知CAD的患者进行初始冠脉评估,CCTA可能是SPECT的一种经济高效的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号