...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Safety and efficacy of clopidogrel reloading in patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy who present with an acute coronary syndrome and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of clopidogrel reloading in patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy who present with an acute coronary syndrome and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

机译:在患有急性冠状动脉综合征并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性氯吡格雷治疗患者中进行氯吡格雷再装载的安全性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The clinical safety and efficacy of clopidogrel reloading in patients receiving long-term clopidogrel therapy who present with acute coronary syndromes and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention have not yet been evaluated. The study cohort comprised 1,368 consecutive patients receiving long-term clopidogrel therapy (75 mg/day) who had presented with acute coronary syndromes and underwent coronary artery stent implantation. In total, 926 patients were given a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose (reload cohort) before cardiac catheterization, while 442 patients were not reloaded (no-reload cohort). Patients who had presented with cardiogenic shock or stable angina were excluded. The 2 cohorts were well matched for the conventional risk factors for coronary artery disease. The analyzed clinical end points of death (1.1% vs 0.9%, p = 0.77), death or Q-wave myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 0.9%, p = 1.0), target lesion revascularization (0.2% vs 0.8%, p = 0.45), target vessel revascularization (1.1% vs 1.1%, p = 1.0), and major adverse cardiac events (2.0% vs 1.8%, p = 0.8) were similar between the no-reload and reload groups at 30 days. The in-hospital rates of major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding were also similar between the 2 cohorts. There were no cases of definite stent thrombosis. In conclusion, patients receiving long-term clopidogrel therapy who present with acute coronary syndromes do not gain any clinical benefit from additional reloading with clopidogrel.
机译:尚未评估长期接受氯吡格雷治疗并患有急性冠状动脉综合征并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的氯吡格雷再装载的临床安全性和有效性。该研究队列包括1,368名接受长期氯吡格雷治疗(75毫克/天)的连续患者,这些患者曾出现急性冠状动脉综合征并接受了冠状动脉支架植入术。总共926例患者在心脏导管插入之前接受了600 mg氯吡格雷负荷剂量(再负荷队列),而442例患者未再负荷(无负荷队列)。出现心源性休克或稳定型心绞痛的患者被排除在外。这两个队列与冠心病的常规危险因素非常匹配。分析的临床终点(1.1%vs. 0.9%,p = 0.77),死亡或Q波心肌梗死(0.9%vs 0.9%,p = 1.0),目标病变血运重建(0.2%vs 0.8%,p =在第30天的无再负荷组和再负荷组之间,目标血管血运重建(1.1%vs 1.1%,p = 1.0)和主要不良心脏事件(2.0%vs 1.8%,p = 0.8)相似。在这两个队列之间,院内大出血和胃肠道出血的发生率也相似。没有明确的支架血栓形成病例。总而言之,接受长期氯吡格雷治疗并伴有急性冠状动脉综合征的患者不会因氯吡格雷的再负荷而获得任何临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号