首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Distribution of traditional and novel risk factors and their relation to subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial).
【24h】

Distribution of traditional and novel risk factors and their relation to subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial).

机译:急性冠状动脉综合征患者中传统危险因素和新型危险因素的分布及其与后续心血管事件的关系(来自PROVE IT-TIMI 22试验)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current guidelines recommend risk stratification largely based on traditional risk factors such as those in the Framingham Risk Score. We studied the distribution of 12 traditional and non-traditional risk markers (age > or =65 years, male gender, family history of premature coronary heart disease, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol > or =70 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women, systolic blood pressure >130 mm Hg, diabetes mellitus, smoking, C-reactive protein > or =2 mg/L, triglycerides >150 mg/dl, prediabetes defined as a fasting glucose level 100 to 125 mg/dl or hemoglobin A1c >6, and obesity defined as body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2)) in 3,675 patients from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial at 4 months and evaluated the risk of cardiovascular events stratified by the number of risk factors. The median number of risk factors was 5. In individual risk factor subgroups, men, smokers, hypertensives, and patients with increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had just that added risk factor compared to their counterparts (median 5 vs 4). In contrast, patients with diabetes, prediabetes, and increased triglycerides, C-reactive protein, or body mass index had not only that, but also another added risk factor (median 6 vs 4). A higher risk factor count was strongly related with increased rate of death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, or revascularization, from 0% to 38.6% at 2 years for 0 to > or =9 risk factors (p <0.0001). In conclusion, with the observed "clustering" of risk factors and the link between increasing risk factor count and adverse outcomes in a patient with 1 diagnosed risk factor, a comprehensive review of traditional and novel risk factors is important to fully assess cardiovascular risk.
机译:当前的指南建议风险分层主要基于传统风险因素,例如Framingham风险评分中的那些因素。我们研究了12种传统和非传统危险标志物的分布(年龄> = 65岁,男性,早发冠心病的家族史,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇>或= 70 mg / dl,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇男性<40 mg / dl,女性<50 mg / dl,收缩压> 130 mm Hg,糖尿病,吸烟,C反应蛋白>或= 2 mg / L,甘油三酸酯> 150 mg / dl,糖尿病前期PROVE IT-TIMI 22试验的3675名患者在4个月时的空腹血糖水平为100至125 mg / dl或血红蛋白A1c> 6,肥胖定义为体重指数>或= 30 kg / m(2)),通过风险因素的数量对心血管事件的风险进行了分层评估。危险因素的中位数为5。在单个危险因素亚组中,男性,吸烟者,高血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平升高的患者与其他危险因素相比,其危险因素增加了(中位数为5对4)。相比之下,糖尿病,糖尿病前期患者,甘油三酸酯,C反应蛋白或体重指数升高的患者不仅具有上述特征,而且还具有其他增加的危险因素(中位数为6 vs 4)。较高的危险因素计数与死亡率,心肌梗塞,不稳定的心绞痛,中风或血运重建率增加密切相关,对于2至0或= 9的危险因素,在2年时从0%增至38.6%(p <0.0001)。总而言之,在观察到的危险因素“聚类”以及增加的危险因素计数和具有1个已诊断危险因素的患者的不良结局之间的联系之后,对传统和新型危险因素的全面回顾对于全面评估心血管疾病风险很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号