...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Chest pain center accreditation is associated with better performance of centers for medicare and medicaid services core measures for acute myocardial infarction.
【24h】

Chest pain center accreditation is associated with better performance of centers for medicare and medicaid services core measures for acute myocardial infarction.

机译:胸痛中心认证与医疗中心和医疗服务中心针对急性心肌梗塞的核心措施的更好表现相关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was determine whether hospitals accredited by the Society of Chest Pain Centers hospitals (accredited chest pain centers [ACPCs]) are associated with better performance regarding Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services core measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than nonaccredited hospitals. The study was a retrospective, observational cohort study of hospitals reporting Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services core measures for AMI from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2005, on the basis of the presence or absence of Society of Chest Pain Centers accreditation. Data were obtained from the Web sites of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Hospital Compare), Society of Chest Pain Centers listings, and the American Hospital Directory. Groups were compared in terms of demographics and mean percentage compliance with all 8 AMI core measures. Student's t test, chi-square analysis, and logistic regression were used to analyze bivariate relations. Multivariate logistic regression models used a propensity-score adjustment factor. Of the 4,197 hospitals that reported core measures for AMI, 178 (4%) were accredited and 4,019 (96%) were not. ACPCs had been accredited for an average of 12 months and were larger (378 vs 204 beds), more often teaching hospitals (52% vs 30%), and more often urban (95% vs 69%) (all p 0.0001). There were 395,250 patients with AMIs, of whom 55,418 (14%) presented to ACPCs and 339,832 (86%) presented to nonaccredited hospitals. There was significantly greater compliance with all 8 AMI core measures at ACPCs (p 0.0001), except for lytic therapy 30 minutes after arrival (p = 0.04), for which unadjusted performance was the same. In conclusion, ACPCs were associated with better compliance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services core measures and saw a greater proportion of patients with AMIs.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定由胸痛协会中心认可的医院(经认可的胸痛中心[ACPC])在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心针对急性心肌梗死(AMI)的核心指标方面的表现是否优于未经认可的医院。医院。这项研究是一项回顾性,观察性队列研究,根据存在或不存在胸痛协会的认可,从2005年1月1日至2005年12月31日,报告了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的AMI核心措施的医院。数据从医疗保险和医疗补助中心(医院比较),胸痛协会中心列表以及美国医院目录网站获得。比较了各组的人口统计学特征以及对所有8种AMI核心指标的平均合规率。使用学生t检验,卡方分析和逻辑回归分析双变量关系。多元逻辑回归模型使用倾向得分调整因子。在报告了AMI核心指标的4197家医院中,有178家(4%)获得了认可,而4,019家(96%)没有通过。 ACPC的平均认可时间为12个月,并且更大(378张和204张床位),教学医院的次数更多(52%vs 30%)和城市的次数更多(95%vs 69%)(所有p <0.0001)。有395,250例AMI患者,其中55,418例(14%)出现在ACPC上,339,832例(86%)出现在未经认可的医院。 ACPC上所有8种AMI核心指标的依从性均显着提高(p <0.0001),但到达后30分钟以内的溶胞疗法(p = 0.04)除外,其未经调整的性能相同。总之,ACPC与更好地遵守医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的核心措施相关,并且看到更多的AMI患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号