首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice >Feasibility of a practical clinical trial for asthma conducted in primary care.
【24h】

Feasibility of a practical clinical trial for asthma conducted in primary care.

机译:在初级保健中进行哮喘临床实践试验的可行性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Practical clinical trials (PCTs) are essential to generate relevant evidence-based information to improve patient health. Primary care physicians' experience performing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on representative patient populations is limited. We implemented a pilot practice-based asthma PCT to answer the following feasibility questions: (1) Was clinician interest initiated and maintained? (2) Did clinicians enroll patients into an RCT and complete follow-up? (3) Was an interactive voice-response (IVR) telephone system useful to collect patient-reported data? METHODS: The protocol included (1) broadly representative adult asthma eligibility criteria, (2) self-reported patient-oriented outcomes, and (3) use of IVR to collect these data. Physicians in practice-based research networks, managed care organizations, and academic networks volunteered to participate. RESULTS: Of 13 physician volunteers, 10 (8 single-person office practices, 1 emergency department physician, 1 clinical researcher) from 4 states and 1 Canadian province enrolled 58 subjects and randomized 45 meeting final eligibility criteria; 39 (87%) attended the follow-up visit. However, only 34 (76%) provided adequate follow-up IVR self-report data, and subjects with less than a high school education provided significantly (P <.001) less data than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Physician recruiting, randomizing, and completing a representative sample of adult asthma patients was feasible. The utility of IVR in primary care research requires further study.
机译:背景:实践临床试验(PCT)对于产生相关的循证信息以改善患者健康至关重要。基层医疗医生对代表性患者群体进行随机对照试验(RCT)的经验有限。我们实施了基于实践的试验性PCT,以回答以下可行性问题:(1)是否启动并维持了临床医生的兴趣? (2)临床医生是否将患者纳入RCT并完成随访? (3)交互式语音应答(IVR)电话系统对收集患者报告的数据有用吗?方法:该方案包括(1)具有广泛代表性的成人哮喘患者入选标准,(2)自我报告的以患者为中心的结果,以及(3)使用IVR收集这些数据。基于实践的研究网络,可管理的护理组织和学术网络中的医师自愿参加。结果:在13名医师志愿者中,来自4个州和1个加拿大省的10名(8名单人办公室实践,1名急诊科医师,1名临床研究员)招募了58名受试者,并随机分配了45名符合最终入选标准的受试者。 39(87%)人参加了随访。但是,只有34个(76%)提供了足够的IVR随访自我报告数据,而高中文化程度以下的受试者所提供的数据明显少于其他组(P <.001)。结论:医师招募,随机化和完成成人哮喘患者的代表性样本是可行的。 IVR在基层医疗研究中的实用性需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号