...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Comparison of safety of subcutaneous enoxaparin as outpatient anticoagulation bridging therapy in patients with a mechanical heart valve versus patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Comparison of safety of subcutaneous enoxaparin as outpatient anticoagulation bridging therapy in patients with a mechanical heart valve versus patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

机译:机械心脏瓣膜患者与非瓣膜性心房颤动患者皮下依诺肝素作为门诊抗凝桥接治疗的安全性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) are at a higher risk for thromboembolic events than patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This difference is observed in the higher maintenance international normalized ratio (INR) range for patients with MHV and in the selection for anticoagulation bridge therapy when warfarin is interrupted perioperatively. However, once the decision is made to "bridge," the same therapeutic options, unfractionated heparin and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), are applicable to the 2 patient populations. Unfractionated heparin requires extended hospitalization and is often not selected. A paucity of published data exist establishing the efficacy and safety of LMWH as a bridging agent. The aim of this study was to describe a single-center experience and to provide data supporting the use of enoxaparin as a bridging agent. The study assessed whether patients with MHV undergoing bridging for a variety of procedures had higher thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk compared to patients with nonvalvular AF. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 173 patients (with MHV and AF) who underwent 230 bridging episodes with an LMWH, enoxaparin, from February 2002 through September 2007. Main outcome measurements were the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events within 2 months after the procedure. Of total bridging episodes, 130 episodes met the inclusion criteria; 62 episodes occurred in the MHV population and 68 episodes occurred in the AF population. The procedures varied from minor invasive procedures to major surgeries. There were no deaths or thromboembolic events. Major and minor bleeding rates were similar between the MHV and AF groups (3.2% and 2.9%, 14.5% and 13.2% respectively, p = NS). The major bleeding rate was similar to published data on bridging therapy. Most bleeding episodes (73%) occurred within 7 days after the procedure. In conclusion, our study provided actual outpatient anticoagulation clinical data on using LMWH as an option for periprocedural bridging anticoagulation in patients with MHV.
机译:机械性心脏瓣膜(MHV)的患者发生血栓栓塞事件的风险高于房颤(AF)的患者。在MHV患者维持较高的国际标准化比率(INR)范围和围手术期中断华法林时选择抗凝桥治疗中观察到这种差异。但是,一旦决定“桥接”,相同的治疗选择,即普通肝素和皮下低分子量肝素(LMWH),将适用于2个患者人群。普通肝素需要长期住院治疗,通常不予选择。很少有公开的数据确定LMWH作为桥联剂的有效性和安全性。这项研究的目的是描述一个单中心的经验,并提供数据支持使用依诺肝素作为桥联剂。这项研究评估了接受过各种方法桥接的MHV患者是否比非瓣膜性AF患者具有更高的血栓栓塞和出血风险。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,从2002年2月至2007年9月,对173例患者进行了230例LMWH依诺肝素桥接治疗(MHV和AF)。主要结局指标是术后2个月内血栓栓塞和出血事件的发生率。在全部桥接发作中,有130项符合纳入标准;在MHV人群中发生62次发作,在AF人群中发生68次发作。程序从微创程序到大手术不等。没有死亡或血栓栓塞事件。 MHV和AF组的主要和次要出血率相似(分别为3.2%和2.9%,14.5%和13.2%,p = NS)。主要出血率与有关桥接治疗的公开数据相似。大多数出血发作(73%)发生在手术后7天内。总之,我们的研究提供了实际的门诊抗凝临床数据,这些数据将LMWH用作MHV患者术中桥联抗凝的一种选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号