首页> 外文期刊>The Laryngoscope: A Medical Journal for Clinical and Research Contributions in Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery .. >Unilateral acoustic neuromas: long-term hearing results in patients managed with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery, and expectantly.
【24h】

Unilateral acoustic neuromas: long-term hearing results in patients managed with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery, and expectantly.

机译:单侧听神经瘤:长期接受分立立体定向放射治疗,听力保护手术和预期治疗的患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Hearing preservation is invariably a consideration when exploring treatment options for acoustic neuromas. We reviewed the long-term hearing results of patients who were treated using 1) hyperfractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSR), 2) hearing preservation tumor excision surgery (HPTES), and 3) expectantly (no treatment). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Single institution retrospective chart review of 42 patients managed with HSR (1993-2003), 113 patients in whom HPTES was carried out, and 86 patients who were untreated (1974-2003). Hearing levels were graded according to the Gardner-Robertson classification. RESULTS: The percent of patients managed with HSR initially who had serviceable hearing (class 1-2) was 68.8%. This fell to 6.7% in the follow-up interval. Of the group treated with HPTES, 100% had preoperative serviceable hearing. This dropped to 15.9% in the follow-up interval. The percent of patients managed expectantly who initially had serviceable hearing was 77.3%. This dropped to 33.3% during the follow-up interval. Mean follow-up periods were 4.0, 9.5, and 6.8 years in the HSR, HPTES, and expectant groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing acuity statistically worsened over the long term (P < .01) in all three groups. There was a significant proportion of patients in whom hearing deteriorated from serviceable to nonserviceable hearing (P < .01) during the follow-up interval. The decline was most significant in the groups treated with HPTES and HSR compared with the group treated expectantly (P < .05). Hearing outcomes, in our experience, continue to be poor, but this is especially so in patients treated with HPTES or HSR.
机译:简介:探索听神经瘤的治疗选择时,始终应考虑听力保护。我们回顾了使用1)超分割立体定向放射疗法(HSR),2)听力保留肿瘤切除术(HPTES)和3)预期(未治疗)的患者的长期听力结果。方法和材料:单机构回顾性图表回顾了42例HSR治疗的患者(1993-2003年),113例进行了HPTES的患者以及86例未经治疗的患者(1974-2003年)。听力水平根据Gardner-Robertson分类进行分级。结果:最初接受HSR治疗且听力正常(1-2级)的患者百分比为68.8%。在随访间隔中下降至6.7%。在接受HPTES治疗的组中,有100%具有术前可服务的听力。在随访间隔中下降到15.9%。最初可进行听觉治疗的预期接受治疗的患者百分比为77.3%。在随访期间,下降到33.3%。 HSR,HPTES和预期组的平均随访期分别为4.0、9.5和6.8年。结论:长期来看,所有三组的听觉统计都较差(P <.01)。在随访期间,有很大一部分患者的听力从可服务的听力恶化为不可服务的听力(P <.01)。与预期治疗组相比,HPTES和HSR治疗组的下降最为明显(P <.05)。根据我们的经验,听力结果仍然很差,但是在接受HPTES或HSR治疗的患者中尤其如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号