首页> 外文期刊>The Library Quarterly: A Journal of Investigation and Discussion in the Field of Library Science >RESEARCH IN PRACTICEA FUND ALLOCATION FORMULA BASED ON DEMAND, COST, AND SUPPLY
【24h】

RESEARCH IN PRACTICEA FUND ALLOCATION FORMULA BASED ON DEMAND, COST, AND SUPPLY

机译:基于需求,成本和供应的实践资金分配公式研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Approximately 40 percent of academic libraries use formulas to allocate book funds among departments or subject areas [1-3]. Consequently, dozens of published articles and reports have appeared on the topic of formula-based fund allocation. (See Walters [4] for a review of the literature.) Unfortunately, every previous strategy for fund allocation requires a set of weights or allocations that can be used as a starting point; for example, fund allocation methods based on linear programming rely on the subjective assessment of each department's importance or value to the university [5-8]. Likewise, regression-based methods require a set of current, past, or hypothetical allocations from which a formula can be derived [4], This essay presents a theoretically grounded method of developing a fund allocation formula that does not rely on the initial estimation of weights or allocations. This method is likely to be especially useful for libraries that have never used fund allocation formulas-those that have no prior basis for rating the importance of particular subject areas, departments, or variables.
机译:大约40%的大学图书馆使用公式在部门或学科领域之间分配图书资金[1-3]。因此,有关基于公式的资金分配的主题出现了数十篇已发表的文章和报告。 (参见Walters [4]的文献综述。)不幸的是,以前的每一种资金分配策略都需要一套权重或分配作为起点。例如,基于线性规划的资金分配方法依赖于对各部门对大学的重要性或价值的主观评估[5-8]。同样,基于回归的方法需要一组当前,过去或假设的分配,可以从中得出公式[4]。本文提出了一种理论基础的方法,该方法可以开发不依赖于初始估计的资金分配公式。权重或分配。这种方法对于从未使用过资金分配公式的图书馆尤其有用,这些公式没有事先对特定学科领域,部门或变量的重要性进行评级的依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号