首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >Can remission in rheumatoid arthritis be assessed without laboratory tests or a formal joint count? Possible remission criteria based on a self-report RAPID3 score and careful joint examination in the ESPOIR cohort
【24h】

Can remission in rheumatoid arthritis be assessed without laboratory tests or a formal joint count? Possible remission criteria based on a self-report RAPID3 score and careful joint examination in the ESPOIR cohort

机译:无需实验室检查或正式的关节计数就可以评估类风湿关节炎的缓解吗?基于自我报告的RAPID3评分和ESPOIR队列中仔细的联合检查的可能缓解标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. To explore 5 possible criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on a patient self-report index, the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3), with a careful joint examination and possible physician global estimate (DOCGL), but without a formal joint count or laboratory test. Methods. The ESPOIR early RA cohort of 813 French patients recruited in 2002-2005 was analyzed to identify patients in remission 6 months after enrollment, according to 2 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria: Boolean ≤ 1 for total tender joint count-28, swollen joint count-28, C-reactive protein, and patient global estimate (PATGL), and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤ 3.3. Agreement with 7 other remission criteria was analyzed - Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) ≤ 2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 2.8, and 5 candidate criteria based on RAPID3, joint examination, and DOCGL: "RAPID3R" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0); "RAPID3R+SJ1" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, ≤ 1 swollen joint); "RAPID3R+SJ1+D1" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, ≤ 1 swollen joint, DOCGL ≤ 1); "RAPID3R+SJ0" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, 0 swollen joints); and "RAPID3R+SJ0+D1" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, 0 swollen joints, DOCGL ≤ 1), according to kappa statistics, sensitivity, and specificity. Residual global, articular, and questionnaire abnormalities according to each criteria set were analyzed. Results. Among 813 ESPOIR patients, 720 had complete data to compare all 9 possible criteria. Substantial agreement with the Boolean criteria was seen for SDAI, CDAI, RAPID3R+SJ1, RAPID3R+SJ1+D1, RAPID3R+SJ0, and RAPID3R+SJ0+D1 (92.2%-94.7%, kappa 0.67-0.79), versus only moderate agreement for DAS28 or RAPID3R (79.9%-85.8%, kappa 0.46-0.55). Conclusion. Remission according to CDAI and RAPID3R+SJ1, but not DAS28 or RAPID3R, is similar to that of the ACR/EULAR criteria. RAPID3 scores require a complementary careful joint examination for clinical decisions, do not preclude formal joint counts or other indices, and may be useful in busy clinical settings. The Journal of Rheumatology
机译:目的。根据患者的自我报告指数,常规指数评估患者指数数据(RAPID3),仔细的联合检查和可能的医师总体评估(DOCGL),探讨5种可能的类风湿关节炎(RA)缓解标准。正式的联合计数或实验室检查。方法。根据2美国风湿病学院/欧洲风湿病联盟(ACR / EULAR)的标准,对2002-2005年招募的813名法国患者的ESPOIR早期RA队列进行了分析,以识别入组后缓解的患者:布尔值≤1嫩关节计数28,肿胀关节计数28,C反应蛋白和患者总体评估(PATGL),且疾病简化活动指数(SDAI)≤3.3。分析了与其他7个缓解标准的一致性-疾病活动度评分28(DAS28)≤2.6,临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)≤2.8,以及基于RAPID3,联合检查和DOCGL的5个候选标准:“ RAPID3R”(RAPID3≤ 3.0); “ RAPID3R + SJ1”(RAPID3≤3.0,≤1个肿胀的关节); “ RAPID3R + SJ1 + D1”(RAPID3≤3.0,关节肿胀≤1,DOCGL≤1); “ RAPID3R + SJ0”(RAPID3≤3.0,0个关节肿胀);根据Kappa统计资料,敏感性和特异性,选择“ RAPID3R + SJ0 + D1”(RAPID3≤3.0,关节肿胀0,DOCGL≤1)。根据每个标准集分析残留的总体,关节和问卷异常。结果。在813名ESPOIR患者中,有720名拥有完整的数据来比较所有9种可能的标准。 SDAI,CDAI,RAPID3R + SJ1,RAPID3R + SJ1 + D1,RAPID3R + SJ0和RAPID3R + SJ0 + D1的布尔标准基本一致(92.2%-94.7%,kappa 0.67-0.79)适用于DAS28或RAPID3R(79.9%-85.8%,kappa 0.46-0.55)。结论。根据CDAI和RAPID3R + SJ1,但不是DAS28或RAPID3R,的缓解类似于ACR / EULAR标准。 RAPID3评分需要进行补充的仔细联合检查以做出临床决定,不排除正式的联合计数或其他指标,并且在繁忙的临床环境中可能有用。风湿病学杂志

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号