首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >The modification of the american college of rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia should be supplemented and revised.
【24h】

The modification of the american college of rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia should be supplemented and revised.

机译:美国风湿病学院纤维肌痛初步诊断标准的修改应予以补充和修订。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria (1990 criteria) had been virtually the sole diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) until the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM (2010 criteria)1 were reported. In 2011, a modification of the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for FM (2011 criteria)2 was reported. Because the 2011 criteria are confusing, they should be supplemented and revised.1. The abstract of an article that includes the 2011 criteria has the following diagnostic criteria: FM symptom scale/score > 132. However, the appendix has the following diagnostic criteria: Widespread Pain Index > 7 and Symptom Severity Score > 5 or Widespread Pain Index between 3-6 and Symptom Severity Score > 92. Which is correct? Or, do these different descriptions have a clear purpose?2. In the Materials and Methods2 the widespread pain questionnaire asks patients to indicate whether they have had pain or tenderness. However, the appendix notes the number of areas in which the patient has had pain2. Which is correct?
机译:在报告了ACR FM初步诊断标准(2010年标准)之前,美国风湿病学会(ACR)1990年标准(1990年标准)实际上一直是纤维肌痛(FM)的唯一诊断标准。 2011年,据报告对ACR FM初步诊断标准(2011年标准)2进行了修改。由于2011年的标准令人困惑,因此应予以补充和修订1。包含2011年标准的文章摘要具有以下诊断标准:FM症状量表/评分>132。但是,附录具有以下诊断标准:广泛性疼痛指数> 7,症状严重度得分> 5或介于两者之间的广泛性疼痛指数3-6,症状严重度得分>92。哪个正确?或者,这些不同的描述是否有明确的目的?2。在《材料和方法》 2中,广泛的疼痛问卷要求患者指出他们是否有疼痛或压痛。但是,附录中记录了患者出现疼痛的部位数量2。哪个是正确的?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号