首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Incomplete Infarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis post-Thrombolysis (INTERCEPT) (see comments)
【24h】

Diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Incomplete Infarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis post-Thrombolysis (INTERCEPT) (see comments)

机译:地尔硫卓在溶栓剂治疗的急性心肌梗死中的随机安慰剂对照试验。欧洲研究人员评估溶栓后预后的不完全梗塞试验(INTERCEPT)(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Diltiazem reduces non-fatal reinfarction and refractory ischaemia after non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, an acute coronary syndrome similar to the incomplete infarction that occurs after successful reperfusion. We postulated that this agent would reduce cardiac events in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated initially with thrombolytic agents-a clinical application previously unexplored with heart-rate-lowering calcium antagonists. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, sequential trial was done in 874 patients with acute myocardial infarction, but without congestive heart failure, who first received thrombolytic agents. Patients received either 300 mg oral diltiazem once daily, or placebo, initiated within 36-96 h of infarct onset, and given for up to 6 months. The trial primary endpoint was the cumulative first event rate of cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, or refractory ischaemia. Additional prespecified endpoints included several composites of non-fatal cardiac events (non-fatal reinfarction combined with refractory ischaemia, all recurrent ischaemia, or the need for myocardial revascularisation). The diagnosis of ischaemia, whether refractory or recurrent, and the need for myocardial revascularisation, was always based on objective electrocardiographical evidence of ischaemia, either at rest or on exertion. RESULTS: For the trial primary endpoint, 131 events occurred in the 444 placebo patients and 97 events in the 430 diltiazem patients (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02; p=0.07). For non-fatal cardiac events, diltiazem treatment was associated with a relative decrease (0.76; 0.58-1.00) in the combined event rate of non-fatal reinfarction and refractory ischaemia. There was a similar decrease in the composite non-fatal endpoints of non-fatal reinfarction combined with all recurrent ischaemia (0.80; 0.64-1.00) and non-fatal reinfarction combined with the need for myocardial revascularisation (0.67; 0.46-0.96). The need for myocardial revascularisation alone was significantly reduced by 42% (0.61; 0.39-0.96). No major safety issues were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem did not reduce the cumulative occurrence of cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, or refractory ischaemia during a 6-month follow-up, but did reduce all composite endpoints of non-fatal cardiac events, especially the need for myocardial revascularisation.
机译:背景:地尔硫卓可减少非Q波心肌梗死后的非致命性再梗死和难治性缺血,这是一种急性冠状动脉综合征,类似于再灌注成功后发生的不完全梗塞。我们推测,这种药物可以减少急性心肌梗塞后最初使用溶栓剂进行治疗的患者的心脏事件-以前尚未通过降低心率的钙拮抗剂进行临床应用。方法:一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,序贯试验在874例急性心肌梗死但无充血性心力衰竭的患者中进行,该患者首次接受了溶栓剂治疗。患者每天在梗死发作后36-96小时内接受300 mg口服地尔硫卓或安慰剂治疗,并给予长达6个月的治疗。试验的主要终点是心脏死亡,非致命性再梗塞或难治性局部缺血的累积首次事件发生率。其他预先指定的终点包括多种非致命性心脏事件(非致命性再梗死合并难治性局部缺血,所有复发性局部缺血或需要心肌血运重建)。缺血性的诊断,无论是难治性还是复发性,以及是否需要进行心肌血运重建,总是基于客观的心电图,无论是静息状态还是劳累状态下的缺血。结果:对于试验的主要终点,444例安慰剂患者发生131例事件,430例地尔硫卓患者发生97例事件(危险比0.79; 95%CI,0.61-1.02; p = 0.07)。对于非致命性心脏事件,地尔硫卓治疗与非致命性再梗死和难治性局部缺血的合并事件发生率相对降低(0.76; 0.58-1.00)。非致命性再梗死合并所有复发性缺血(0.80; 0.64-1.00)和非致命性再梗死合并心肌血运重建的综合非致命性终点也有类似的减少(0.67; 0.46-0.96)。单独进行心肌血运重建的需要显着减少了42%(0.61; 0.39-0.96)。没有遇到重大安全问题。结论:地尔硫卓在6个月的随访中并未减少心脏死亡,非致命性再梗死或难治性缺血的累积发生率,但确实减少了非致命性心脏事件的所有复合终点,尤其是心肌血运重建的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号