...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Depressing research.
【24h】

Depressing research.

机译:令人沮丧的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Suppression of the publication of negative trials of serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in children (Apr 24, p 1335) is more than just a matter of "confusion, manipulation, and institutional failure". It is a crime. To blandly illustrate its severity, we can analogise the situation as follows: would you be concerned if a colleague prescribed penicillin to a child who had an uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection of viral aetiology? Would you be more concerned if you heard that this child had a serious anaphylactic reaction to the penicillin at home? And how much more concerned would you be if you found out that the prescribing doctor was previously aware of the child's severe penicillin allergy? The latter scenario could be deemed malpractice. How, then, is it acceptable for pharmaceutical companies to suppress publication of SSRI studies that showed a lack of efficacy and an increased risk of serious adverse events in the children and adolescents in experimental trial groups (other than for fluoxetine)? Intentional concealment of these data, an accusation for which there is already public evidence, must be considered a form of corporate violence.
机译:抑制儿童血清素选择性再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)阴性试验的发表(4月24日,第1335页)不仅仅是“困惑,操纵和机构失败”的问题。这是犯罪。为了坦率地说明其严重性,我们可以将情况模拟如下:您是否担心一位同事给患有病毒性病因的简单上呼吸道感染的孩子开具青霉素?如果您听说这个孩子在家中对青霉素有严重的过敏反应,您会更担心吗?如果您发现开处方的医生以前知道孩子严重的青霉素过敏,您会更加担心吗?后一种情况可能被认为是不当行为。那么,制药公司如何抑制SSRI研究的发表,这些研究表明在实验试验组(氟西汀除外)中儿童和青少年缺乏疗效且严重不良事件发生的风险增加了?故意隐瞒这些数据(已经有公开证据的指控)必须视为公司暴力的一种形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号