...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) (see comments)
【24h】

Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) (see comments)

机译:最近有症状的颈动脉狭窄的动脉内膜切除术的随机试验:MRC欧洲颈动脉外科手术试验(ECST)的最终结果(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy, primarily in terms of stroke prevention, in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised controlled trial enrolled 3024 patients. We enrolled men and women of any age, with some degree of carotid stenosis, who within the previous 6 months had had at least one transient or mild symptomatic ischaemic vascular event in the distribution of one or both carotid arteries. Between 1981 and 1994, we allocated 1811 (60%) patients to surgery and 1213 (40%) to control (surgery to be avoided for as long as possible). Follow-up was until the end of 1995 (mean 6.1 years), and the main analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The overall outcome (major stroke or death) occurred in 669 (37.0%) surgery-group patients and 442 (36.5%) control-group patients. The risk of major stroke or death complicating surgery (7.0%) did not vary substantially with severity of stenosis. On the other hand, the risk of major ischaemic stroke ipsilateral to the unoperated symptomatic carotid artery increased with severity of stenosis, particularly above about 70-80% of the original luminal diameter, but only for 2-3 years after randomisation. On average, the immediate risk of surgery was worth trading off against the long-term risk of stroke without surgery when the stenosis was greater than about 80% diameter; the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the frequency of a major stroke or death at 3 years was 26.5% for the control group and 14.9% for the surgery group, an absolute benefit from surgery of 11.6%. However, consideration of variations in risk with age and sex modified this simple rule based on stenosis severity. We present a graphical procedure that should improve the selection of patients for surgery. INTERPRETATION: Carotid endarterectomy is indicated for most patients with a recent non-disabling carotid-territory ischaemic event when the symptomatic stenosis is greater than about 80%. Age and sex should also be taken into account in decisions on whether to operate.
机译:背景:我们的目的是评估近期有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉内膜切除术的风险和益处,主要是在中风预防方面。方法:该多中心随机对照试验招募了3024名患者。我们纳入了具有一定程度颈动脉狭窄的任何年龄的男人和女人,他们在过去的6个月内至少有一个短暂或轻度的症状性缺血性血管事件,分布在一个或两个颈动脉中。在1981年至1994年之间,我们分配了1811(60%)位患者进行手术,并分配了1213(40%)位患者进行控制(尽可能避免手术)。随访至1995年底(平均6.1年),主要分析旨在进行治疗。结果:669例(37.0%)手术组患者和442例(36.5%)对照组患者发生了总体预后(大中风或死亡)。发生严重中风或死亡的复杂手术风险(7.0%)随狭窄程度的不同而没有显着差异。另一方面,未手术的症状性颈动脉同侧的主要缺血性中风的风险随狭窄程度的增加而增加,特别是超过原始管腔直径的约70-80%,但仅在随机分配后的2-3年内增加。平均而言,当狭窄大于直径的80%时,立即手术的风险与不进行手术的中风的长期风险是值得的。 Kaplan-Meier估计3年大卒中或死亡的频率在对照组中为26.5%,在手术组中为14.9%,手术绝对收益为11.6%。但是,考虑到随年龄和性别的风险变化,该基于狭窄程度的简单规则得以修改。我们提出了一种图形化的程序,应该可以改善手术患者的选择。解释:对于大多数近期非致残性颈动脉-区域缺血事件且症状性狭窄大于约80%的患者,建议进行颈动脉内膜切除术。在决定是否进行手术时,还应考虑年龄和性别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号