首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Antimicrobial resistance and clinical effectiveness of co-trimoxazole versus amoxycillin for pneumonia among children in Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. Pakistan Co-trimoxazole Study Group.
【24h】

Antimicrobial resistance and clinical effectiveness of co-trimoxazole versus amoxycillin for pneumonia among children in Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. Pakistan Co-trimoxazole Study Group.

机译:复方新诺明与阿莫西林对巴基斯坦儿童肺炎的抗药性和临床有效性:随机对照试验。巴基斯坦Co-trimoxazole研究小组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Co-trimoxazole is widely used in treatment of paediatric pneumonia in developing countries, but drug resistance may decrease its effectiveness. We studied the effectiveness of co-trimoxazole compared with that of amoxycillin in pneumonia therapy, and assessed the clinical impact of co-trimoxazole resistance. METHODS: We recruited 595 children, aged 2-59 months, with non-severe or severe pneumonia (WHO criteria) diagnosed in the outpatient wards of two urban Pakistan hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis co-trimoxazole (n=398) or amoxycillin (n=197) in standard WHO doses and dosing schedules, and were monitored in study wards. The primary outcome was inpatient therapy failure (clinical criteria) or clinical evidence of pneumonia at outpatient follow-up examination. FINDINGS: There were 92 (23%) therapy failures in the co-trimoxazole group and 30 (15%) in the amoxycillin group (p=0.03)-26 (13%) versus 12 (12%) among children with non-severe pneumonia (p=0.856) and 66 (33%) versus 18 (18%) among those with severe pneumonia (p=0.009). For patients with severe pneumonia, age under 1 year (p=0.056) and positive chest radiographs (p=0.005) also predicted therapy failure. There was no significant association between antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration and outcome among bacteraemic children treated with co-trimoxazole. INTERPRETATION: Co-trimoxazole provided effective therapy in non-severe pneumonia. For severe, life-threatening pneumonia, however, co-trimoxazole is less likely than amoxycillin to be effective.
机译:背景:复方新诺明在发展中国家广泛用于治疗小儿肺炎,但耐药性可能会降低其有效性。我们研究了与氨苯西林相比在肺炎治疗中联合曲莫唑的有效性,并评估了联合曲莫唑耐药性的临床影响。方法:我们招募了595名2至59个月大的儿童,这些儿童在巴基斯坦两家城市医院的门诊中诊断为非严重或严重的肺炎(WHO标准)。患者按照标准WHO剂量和给药方案,以2:1为基础随机分配三甲唑(n = 398)或阿莫西林(n = 197),并在研究病房进行监测。主要结局是住院治疗失败(临床标准)或门诊随访检查中肺炎的临床证据。结果:复方新诺明组有92例(23%)治疗失败,阿莫西林组有30例(15%)治疗失败(p = 0.03)-26(13%),非严重儿童为12例(12%)肺炎(p = 0.856)和66(33%)比重(18.8%)的严重肺炎(p = 0.009)。对于重度肺炎患者,未满1岁(p = 0.056)和胸部X光片阳性(p = 0.005)也可预测治疗失败。抗菌药物最低抑菌浓度与接受复方新诺明治疗的细菌性儿童的结局之间无显着相关性。解释:复方新诺明在非严重肺炎中提供了有效的治疗方法。但是,对于严重的,危及生命的肺炎,联合曲莫唑比阿莫西林有效的可能性较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号