...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial.
【24h】

Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial.

机译:房颤外部心脏复律的前后电极位置与前外侧电极位置:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background External cardioversion is a readily available treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation. Although anatomical and electrophysiological considerations suggest that an anterior-posterior electrode position should create a more homogeneous shock-field gradient throughout the atria than an anterior-lateral position, both electrode positions are equally recommended for external cardioversion in current guidelines. We undertook a randomised trial comparing the two positions with the endpoint of successful cardioversion.Methods 108 consecutive patients (mean age 60 years [SD 16]) with persistent atrial fibrillation (median duration 5 months, range 0.1-120) underwent elective external cardioversion by a standardised step-up protocol with increasing shock strengths (50-360 J). Electrode positions were randomly assigned as anterior-lateral or anterior-posterior. If sinus rhythm was not achieved with 360 J energy, a single cross-over shock (360 J) was applied with the other electrode configuration. A planned interim analysis was done after these patients had been recruited; it was by intention to treat.Findings Cardioversion was successful in a higher proportion of the anterior-posterior than the anterior-lateral group (50 of 52 [96%] vs 44 of 56 [78%], difference 23.7% (95% CI 9.1-37.8, p=0.009). Cross-over from the anterior-lateral to the anterior-posterior electrode position was successful in eight of 12 patients, whereas cross-over in the other direction was not successful (two patients). After cross-over, cardioversion was successful in 102 of 108 randomised patients (94%).Interpretation An anterior-posterior electrode position is more effective than the anterior-lateral position for external cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. These results should be considered in clinical practice, for the design of defibrillation electrode pads, and when guidelines for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation are updated.
机译:背景外复律是持续性房颤的一种现成治疗方法。尽管从解剖学和电生理的角度来看,前后电极位置应在整个心房产生比前侧位置更均匀的冲击场梯度,但在当前指南中,均建议将两个电极位置均用于外部心脏复律。我们进行了一项随机试验,比较了这两个位置与成功复律的终点。方法对连续108例持续性心房颤动(平均年龄5个月,范围0.1-120)的患者(平均年龄60岁[SD 16])进行了择期体外复律。具有增加的冲击强度的标准升压方案(50-360 J)。电极位置随机分配为前外侧或前后。如果使用360 J能量无法实现窦性心律,则对另一电极配置施加单次交叉冲击(360 J)。这些患者被招募后进行了计划中的中期分析。发现在前-后组中,比前-后组更高的比例成功进行了心脏复律(52个中的50个[96%] vs 56个中的44个[78%],差异为23.7%(95%CI 9.1-37.8,p = 0.009)。12例患者中有8例成功从前外侧到前电极位置的交叉成功,而另一方向的交叉成功(2例)。在108名随机分组的患者中,有102名成功进行了电复律(94%)。解释对于持续性房颤的体外电复律,前后电极位置比前外侧位置更有效,这些结果应在临床实践中加以考虑,用于除颤电极垫的设计,以及何时更新房颤的电复律指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号