首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists >Evaluation of a rapid method for extracting deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
【24h】

Evaluation of a rapid method for extracting deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)

机译:评估脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)的快速提取方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Molecular laboratories require rapid and reliable methods for sample preparation. However, traditional DNA extraction techniques are generally time consuming (taking at least one hour to perform), and labor intensive (consisting of at least five manual steps). The purpose of this study was to compare a twostep DNA extraction method (GENERATION~(TM) Capture Disk Kit, Gentra, Minneapolis, MN) with our standard protocol (Puregene~R, Gentra, Minneapolis, MN). The Capture Disk method was used to extract DNA from buffy coat and plasma samples. Results were compared to DNA extractions performed using our standard protocol on the same samples, To determine if DNA could be extracted by the Capture Disk method, 30 human and two pig peripheral blood samples were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers for the human beta globin gene. To determine if the Capture Disk method could be utilized for an existing clinical test, 21 peripheral blood samples were extracted by both methods and then amplified using primers detecting a genetic mutation, factor V_(Leiden). Products from each PCR reaction were detected by gel electrophoresis. To determine the ability of the Capture Disk to isolate viral DNA, 20 plasma samples were extracted and amplified by PCR using primers for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and then detected colorimetrically. DNA bands were observed for all samples tested for human beta globin and factor V_(Leiden). There was 100% correlation of test results for factor V_(Leiden) between the two extraction methods. Isolation of viral DNA was unsuccessful. All known CMV positive samples tested were either negative or weakly positive. We also compared the time to perform each method as well as the associated labor and supply costs. The total extraction time for the GENERATION~(TM) Capture Disk averaged 26 minutes while the standard method took 102 minutes. The cost of the Capture Disk was dollar 1.40 per test compared to dollar 1,95 per test by the standard protocol, We conclude that the GENERATION~(TM) Capture Disk is a rapid technique for isolating DNA from clinical samples, It efficiently isolates DNA from buffy coats (as shown by the results for human beta globin) in sufficient quantities for clinical testing (as shown by the results for the factor V_(Leiden) test). Results were inconclusive for isolating viral DNA from plasma. The timesavings over the traditional technique is significant (opproximately 76 minutes per test). Cost is approximately dollar 0.55/test less than that incurred by the standard protocol,
机译:分子实验室需要快速可靠的样品制备方法。但是,传统的DNA提取技术通常很耗时(至少需要一个小时才能完成),而且劳动强度大(至少需要五个手动步骤)。这项研究的目的是将两步法DNA提取方法(GENERATIONTM捕获盘试剂盒,Gentra,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)与我们的标准方案(Puregene R,Gentra,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)进行比较。捕获盘法用于从血沉棕黄层和血浆样品中提取DNA。将结果与使用我们的标准规程对相同样品进行的DNA提取进行比较,为确定DNA是否可以通过Capture Disk方法提取,使用了引物,通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增了30个人和两个猪外周血样品人类β球蛋白基因。为了确定捕获磁盘方法是否可用于现有的临床测试,两种方法均提取了21种外周血样品,然后使用检测遗传突变因子V_(Leiden)的引物进行扩增。通过凝胶电泳检测每个PCR反应的产物。为了确定捕获盘分离病毒DNA的能力,使用巨细胞病毒(CMV)引物通过PCR提取和扩增20个血浆样品,然后进行比色检测。在所有测试的人β珠蛋白和因子V_(Leiden)样品中均观察到DNA条带。两种提取方法之间的因子V_(Leiden)测试结果具有100%的相关性。病毒DNA的分离失败。测试的所有已知CMV阳性样品均为阴性或弱阳性。我们还比较了执行每种方法的时间以及相关的人工和供应成本。 GENERATION〜(TM)捕获磁盘的总提取时间平均为26分钟,而标准方法则为102分钟。捕获盘的成本为每项测试1.40美元,而标准协议为每项测试1.95美元,我们得出结论,GENERATION〜(TM)捕获盘是一种从临床样品中分离DNA的快速技术,它可以有效地分离DNA从血沉棕黄层(如人β球蛋白的结果所示)中提取足够的量用于临床测试(如V_(Leiden)因子的结果所示)。从血浆中分离病毒DNA的结果尚无定论。与传统技术相比,可节省大量时间(每次测试约76分钟)。与标准协议相比,每次测试的费用大约少了0.55美元,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号