首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Compression-Only CPR or Standard CPR in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
【24h】

Compression-Only CPR or Standard CPR in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

机译:院外心脏骤停的仅压缩CPR或标准CPR

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUNDEmergency medical dispatchers give instructions on how to perform cardiopulmo-nary resuscitation (CPR) over the telephone to callers requesting help for a patient with suspected cardiac arrest, before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. A previous study indicated that instructions to perform CPR consisting of only chest compression result in a treatment efficacy that is similar or even superior to that associated with instructions given to perform standard CPR, which consists of both compression and ventilation. That study, however, was not powered to assess a possible difference in survival. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the possible superiority of compression-only CPR over standard CPR with respect to survival.METHODSPatients with suspected, witnessed, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were randomly assigned to undergo either compression-only CPR or standard CPR. The primary end point was 30-day survival.RESULTSData for the primary analysis were collected from February 2005 through January 2009 for a total of 1276 patients. Of these, 620 patients had been assigned to receive compression-only CPR and 656 patients had been assigned to receive standard CPR. The rate of 30-day survival was similar in the two groups: 8.7% (54 of 620 patients) in the group receiving compression-only CPR and 7.0% (46 of 656 patients) in the group receiving standard CPR (absolute difference for compression-only vs. standard CPR, 1.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -1.2 to 4.6; P=0.29).CONCLUSIONSThis prospective, randomized study showed no significant difference with respect to survival at 30 days between instructions given by an emergency medical dispatcher, before the arrival of EMS personnel, for compression-only CPR and instructions for standard CPR in patients with suspected, witnessed, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and others; Karolinska Clinical Trial Registration number, CT20080012.)
机译:背景技术紧急医疗调度员在紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员到达之前,通过电话向呼叫者发出关于如何进行心肺复苏(CPR)的指令,以请求可疑心脏骤停患者的帮助。先前的研究表明,仅由胸部按压组成的执行CPR的指令所产生的治疗效果类似于或什至优于与执行由按压和通气组成的标准CPR的指令相关的功效。但是,该研究无权评估生存率的可能差异。这项前瞻性,随机研究的目的是评估纯压CPR相对于标准CPR在生存方面的优势.METHODSP将怀疑,目击,院外心脏骤停的患者随机分配为接受纯压CPR或标准心肺复苏术。主要终点为30天生存期。结果从2005年2月至2009年1月收集了1276例患者的主要分析数据。其中,有620名患者被指定接受仅加压CPR,有656名患者被指定接受标准CPR。两组的30天生存率相似:仅接受加压CPR的组为8.7%(620名患者中的54名),而接受标准CPR(加压的绝对差异)的组为7.0%(656名患者中的46名) -与标准CPR相比,为1.7个百分点; 95%置信区间为-1.2至4.6; P = 0.29)。该前瞻性随机研究显示,急救医疗人员在30天生存率方面无显着差异。在EMS人员到达之前,对怀疑,目击医院外心脏骤停的患者进行仅加压CPR和标准CPR的说明。 (由瑞典心肺基金会等资助; Karolinska临床试验注册号CT20080012。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号