...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.
【24h】

Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

机译:抗抑郁试验的选择性出版物及其对表观疗效的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine is valuable to the extent that the evidence base is complete and unbiased. Selective publication of clinical trials--and the outcomes within those trials--can lead to unrealistic estimates of drug effectiveness and alter the apparent risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: We obtained reviews from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for studies of 12 antidepressant agents involving 12,564 patients. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify matching publications. For trials that were reported in the literature, we compared the published outcomes with the FDA outcomes. We also compared the effect size derived from the published reports with the effect size derived from the entire FDA data set. RESULTS: Among 74 FDA-registered studies, 31%, accounting for 3449 study participants, were not published. Whether and how the studies were published were associated with the study outcome. A total of 37 studies viewed by the FDA as having positive results were published; 1study viewed as positive was not published. Studies viewed by the FDA as having negative or questionable results were, with 3 exceptions, either not published (22 studies) or published in a way that, in our opinion, conveyed a positive outcome (11 studies). According to the published literature, it appeared that 94% of the trials conducted were positive. By contrast, the FDA analysis showed that 51% were positive. Separate meta-analyses of the FDA and journal data sets showed that the increase in effect size ranged from 11 to 69% for individual drugs and was 32% overall. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot determine whether the bias observed resulted from a failure to submit manuscripts on the part of authors and sponsors, from decisions by journal editors and reviewers not to publish, or both. Selective reporting of clinical trial results may have adverse consequences for researchers, study participants, health care professionals, and patients.
机译:背景:循证医学在证据基础完整而公正的程度上具有重要的价值。临床试验的选择性发表-以及这些试验的结果-可能导致对药物有效性的不切实际的估计并改变表观风险收益率。方法:我们获得了美国食品药物管理局(FDA)对涉及12564名患者的12种抗抑郁药的研究的评价。我们进行了系统的文献检索,以找出匹配的出版物。对于文献报道的试验,我们将已发表的结果与FDA结果进行了比较。我们还比较了从已发表的报告得出的效应量与从整个FDA数据集得出的效应量。结果:在74项FDA注册研究中,未发表的占31%,占3449名研究参与者。研究是否发表以及如何发表与研究结果有关。 FDA总共发表了37项研究结果为阳性的研究; 1研究被视为肯定的研究尚未发表。 FDA认为结果为阴性或可疑的研究有3个例外,要么未发表(22个研究),要么以我们认为传达阳性结果的方式发表(11个研究)。根据已发表的文献,看来进行的试验中有94%是阳性的。相比之下,FDA分析显示51%为阳性。 FDA和期刊数据集的单独荟萃分析显示,每种药物的效应量增加幅度为11%至69%,总体为32%。结论:我们无法确定观察到的偏见是否是由于作者和赞助者未能提交稿件,期刊编辑和审稿人决定不发表稿件,还是两者兼而有之。选择性报告临床试验结果可能会对研究人员,研究参与者,医疗保健专业人员和患者产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号