...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
【24h】

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

机译:腰椎退行性腰椎滑脱的手术和非手术治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Management of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is controversial. Surgery is widely used, but its effectiveness in comparison with that of nonsurgical treatment has not been demonstrated in controlled trials. METHODS: Surgical candidates from 13 centers in 11 U.S. states who had at least 12 weeks of symptoms and image-confirmed degenerative spondylolisthesis were offered enrollment in a randomized cohort or an observational cohort. Treatment was standard decompressive laminectomy (with or without fusion) or usual nonsurgical care. The primary outcome measures were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) bodily pain and physical function scores (100-point scales, with higher scores indicating less severe symptoms) and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (100-point scale, with lower scores indicating less severe symptoms) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. RESULTS: We enrolled 304 patients in the randomized cohort and 303 in the observational cohort. The baseline characteristics of the two cohorts were similar. The one-year crossover rates were high in the randomized cohort (approximately 40% in each direction) but moderate in the observational cohort (17% crossover to surgery and 3% crossover to nonsurgical care). The intention-to-treat analysis for the randomized cohort showed no statistically significant effects for the primary outcomes. The as-treated analysis for both cohorts combined showed a significant advantage for surgery at 3 months that increased at 1 year and diminished only slightly at 2 years. The treatment effects at 2 years were 18.1 for bodily pain (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 21.7), 18.3 for physical function (95% CI, 14.6 to 21.9), and -16.7 for the Oswestry Disability Index (95% CI, -19.5 to -13.9). There was little evidence of harm from either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In nonrandomized as-treated comparisons with careful control for potentially confounding baseline factors, patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treated surgically showed substantially greater improvement in pain and function during a period of 2 years than patients treated nonsurgically. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000409 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
机译:背景:退行性脊柱滑脱伴椎管狭窄的治疗存在争议。外科手术被广泛使用,但是与非手术治疗相比,其有效性尚未在对照试验中得到证实。方法:向来自美国11个州的13个中心的,至少有12周症状和影像确认的退行性腰椎滑脱的手术候选人提供了随机队列或观察队列。治疗方法是标准减压椎板切除术(有或没有融合)或常规的非手术治疗。主要结局指标是医学成果研究36项简短形式的一般健康状况调查(SF-36)的身体疼痛和身体功能评分(100分制,得分越高表示症状越轻)和改良的Oswestry残疾指数(在6周,3个月,6个月,1年和2年时评分为100分,分数越低表示症状越轻。结果:我们纳入了随机队列的304例患者和观察性队列的303例患者。两个队列的基线特征相似。随机分组的一年交叉率较高(每个方向大约40%),而观察性队列的中等交叉率(手术交叉率为17%,非手术交叉率为3%)。随机队列的意向治疗分析显示,对于主要结局无统计学意义的影响。两组患者的治疗后分析均显示3个月手术具有显着优势,在1年时增加,而在2年时仅略有减少。 2年时的身体疼痛治疗率为18.1(95%置信区间[CI],为14.5至21.7),身体功能为18.3(95%CI,14.6至21.9),以及Oswestry残疾指数为-16.7(95%) CI,-19.5至-13.9)。几乎没有证据表明任何一种治疗都会造成伤害。结论:在非随机治疗的比较中,通过仔细控制潜在的混杂基线因素,与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗的退行性脊椎滑脱和脊椎狭窄患者在2年的疼痛和功能改善显着更大。 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00000409 [ClinicalTrials.gov]。)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号